Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

145
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
145

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Input-dependent directionality of interactions between cortical areas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Fast Multigroup Gaussian Process Factor Models.

Neural computation·2025
Same author

Relating natural image statistics to patterns of response covariability in macaque primary visual cortex.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Adaptation with Naturalistic Textures in Macaque V1 and V2.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

The representational geometry for naturalistic textures in macaque V1 and V2.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Circuit-motivated generalized affine models characterize stimulus-dependent visual cortical shared variability.

iScience·2024
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input.

Joann Huizhen Tang1, Selina S Solomon1, Adam Kohn2

  • 1Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

Brain and Cognition
|October 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain distinguishes between expectations formed implicitly from stimuli and those driven by task demands. Attention, guided by tasks, can override or modulate stimulus-driven expectations, impacting predictive processing.

Keywords:
Event-related potentials (ERPs)ExpectationPredictive codingTemporal processingVisual attention

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.2K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.2K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • The brain's ability to form expectations from regularities is crucial for efficient sensory processing.
  • The interplay between implicit expectations, explicit task demands, and attention in predictive coding remains an active area of research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the brain generates expectations from stimulus regularities.
  • To differentiate neural responses to implicitly versus explicitly driven expectations.
  • To explore the role of attention in expectation formation and prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record neural responses.
  • Participants viewed temporal patterns of visual input under two distinct task conditions.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were analyzed to identify neural correlates of expectation and attention.

Main Results:

  • Task-relevant patterns elicited specific event-related brain potentials (ERPs) related to expectation.
  • Task-irrelevant patterns did not elicit the same neural indicators of expectation or violation detection.
  • A clear distinction emerged between expectation and attention, modulated by task requirements.

Conclusions:

  • Implicit exposure to stimulus patterns alone may not be sufficient to evoke neural effects of expectation.
  • Task-driven attentional control can operate independently of stimulus-driven expectations.
  • Attention plays a critical role in regulating responses to minimize distraction and optimize sensory processing.