Sequential oxidation procedures with KMnO4: Component characteristics of labile reducing capacity fractions in
Xuemei Chen1, Zhijun Li2, Songjie Fu3
1Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Abstract:
Reducing substances are a mixture of different forms and types and play extremely important roles in manipulating the redox status of sediments, benthic habitats, and substance exchanges at the sediment-water interface in aquatic ecosystems. However, little is known about their abundance, forms, and reducibility in sediments. In this study, the procedures were developed to sequentially fractionate sediment reducing capacity (RC) fractions with the pH dependence of KMnO4 oxidability. The procedures were then applied to 60 sediments from 2 lakes and 3 reservoirs, generating an RCpH7.0 fraction (oxidized at ~0.48 V [reference: SHE]) and an RCpH2.0 fraction (oxidized at ~0.95 V [reference: SHE]), and the component of each fraction was characterized. The RCpH7.0 fraction amounted to 45.4 ± 25.9 cmol e-·kg-1 DW, and the RCpH2.0 fraction amounted to 42.8 ± 22.9 cmol e-·kg-1 DW; fraction sizes depended greatly on sediment origin. Reducing organic substances (ROS) were the main contributors to the RC fractions, with mean value of 30.0 ± 24.1 and 38.5 ± 22.2 cmol e-·kg-1 DW in RCpH7.0 (% contribution: 68.0 ± 5.3 % of RCpH7.0) and RCpH2.0 (90.0 ± 1.5 % of RCpH2.0), respectively. The next contributor was Fe(II), with mean value of 13.5 ± 8.2 and 3.8 ± 3.7 cmol e-·kg-1 DW in RCpH7.0 (28.3 ± 5.2 %) and in RCpH2.0 (9.9 ± 8.6 %), respectively. The smallest component was sulfide (Sn), which had a mean of 2.0 ± 3.1 cmol e-·kg-1 DW in RCpH7.0 and was essentially negligible in RCpH2.0. The number of electrons lost per mole of reducing substances (Ni) differed between the two RC fractions and among sediments of different origins. NROS was lower in the RCpH7.0 fraction (0.22 ± 0.09) compared to the RCpH2.0 fraction (0.31 ± 0.12) and significantly related to levels of active Fe(III) and sulfides (Sn) (p < 0.05). The opposite pattern was seen for NFe(II) and NSn. Based on the compositive reducing capacity (CRC) for the RCpH7.0 fraction, sediment redox status could be classified as ROS-Fe(II) (3.8 ± 1.7 cmol e-·kg-1 DW) or ROS-Sn (10.1 ± 4.8 cmol e-·kg-1 DW) (weaker vs. stronger, respectively; p < 0.01). The RC-based index provides a more comprehensive perspective on characterizing sediment redox status compared to the Eh.
Related Concept Videos
Redox Titration: Other Oxidizing and Reducing Agents
Metabolism of Chemolithotrophs
Oxidation of Phenols to Quinones
o-hydroxy phenols are oxidized to o-quinones and p-hydroxy phenols to p-quinones. Such redox reactions involve the transfer of two electrons and two protons. The reversible redox...
Oxidation of Alkenes: Syn Dihydroxylation with Potassium Permanganate
Oxidation and Reduction of Organic Molecules
The removal of an electron from a molecule, results in a...
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...


