Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
Published on: June 8, 2020
Projected Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Novel Molecular Blood-Based or Stool-Based Screening Tests for Colorectal
Uri Ladabaum1, Ajitha Mannalithara1, Robert E Schoen2
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (U.L., A.M.).
Novel cell-free DNA blood tests (cf-bDNA) show potential for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening but may not be cost-effective compared to established methods. Their net benefit depends on uptake by individuals who would otherwise decline screening.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is crucial for early detection and improved outcomes.
- Emerging technologies like cell-free DNA blood tests (cf-bDNA) and advanced stool tests offer new avenues for CRC screening.
- The clinical and economic impacts of these novel screening modalities require thorough evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the clinical and economic impacts of novel colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests.
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of cf-bDNA and next-generation stool tests against established CRC screening methods.
- To assess the influence of participation rates and test substitution on CRC incidence and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the MOSAIC (Model of Screening and Surveillance for Colorectal Cancer) simulation model.
- Published data on screening test performance, participation, and costs were utilized.
- The study modeled average-risk individuals aged 45 to 100 years within a health sector perspective.
Main Results:
- Established screening methods like colonoscopy and annual fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) were found to be more cost-effective than novel cf-bDNA tests.
- The cf-bDNA test (Guardant Shield) had a higher cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained compared to less expensive and more effective alternatives.
- Sensitivity analyses indicated that incremental costs of novel tests could exceed benefits if screening intervals were shortened, and outcomes depended heavily on patient uptake and substitution patterns.
Conclusions:
- First-generation cf-bDNA tests may offer net benefit or harm, contingent on their ability to engage individuals who decline other screening methods versus replacing more effective existing options.
- The optimal implementation strategy for cf-bDNA tests requires careful consideration of participation dynamics to maximize benefits and minimize potential harms.
- Further research into longitudinal test-specific participation patterns is needed to refine cost-effectiveness models for novel CRC screening technologies.
More Related Videos
10:35A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: April 5, 2018
08:14MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
Published on: October 26, 2017