Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Surgical Tracheostomies: A Retrospective Chart Analysis Comparing ENT Specialists and Residents
Virginia Dallari1, Francesca De Cecco1, Carlotta Liberale1
1Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Aim:
The primary aim of our retrospective chart review is to compare open surgical (OS) tracheostomies performed by specialist and supervised resident surgeons, focusing on surgical time and post-surgical complications. The secondary objective was to compare these data based on the years of surgical experience for both specialists and residents.
Methods:
All patients undergoing surgical tracheostomy at the Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona between 1 January 2017, and 31 December 2022, were subjected to a retrospective analysis. A total of 385 OS tracheostomies were included in the study. Procedures conducted by supervised residents across various training years were compared with those performed by junior and senior specialists, focusing on surgical duration and postoperative complications. Subsequently, these data were stratified based on the surgical experience of subgroups: residents were categorized into 4 years of training, and specialists were categorized into junior (with less than 5 years of experience) and senior (with at least 5 years).
Results:
Statistical analysis concerning patients' anatomy revealed a significant increase in operative times among those with no palpable neck landmarks (p = 0.006) and those with previous neck surgery (p = 0.039). Among patients' comorbidities, only anticoagulant or antiaggregant therapy was found to prolong operative time (p = 0.018), while the ASA score did not correlate with the duration of surgery. Finally, no statistically significant differences in surgical time were observed (p = 0.287), and no significant differences in complication frequency were reported between supervised residents and specialists (p = 0.908), regardless of years of experience.
Conclusions:
Under appropriate supervision, OS tracheostomy has demonstrated safety for residents as early as their first year of residency. Residents can perform tracheostomies without significantly prolonging the duration of the operation or increasing the risk of peri- and post-operative complications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Tracheostomy Care I: Pre-procedural Steps
Required Equipment
The equipment necessary for tracheostomy care includes:
Tracheostomy Suctioning II: Procedure
Tracheostomy Suctioning I: Pre-Procedural Steps
Equipment Required
First, gather all necessary equipment: a sterile suction catheter, a sterile disposable container, sterile gloves, a towel or...
Tracheostomy Decannulation
Description of the Procedure
Decannulation refers to the permanent removal of the tracheostomy tube, signaling the resolution of the condition that initially necessitated the tracheostomy. The process requires a well-coordinated interplay between...
Oxygen Delivering System III: Tracheostomy and T-piece
Tracheostomy
A tracheostomy is a surgically created opening (stoma) in the anterior part of the trachea. It is used to establish a patient airway, bypass an upper airway obstruction, simplify the removal of secretions, permit long-term...

