Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG
Published on: May 3, 2017
Cognitive representations of social relationships and their developmental origins
1Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, USA athomas@g.harvard.edu.
Abstract:
In this paper, I use findings from infant psychology to propose that humans have core knowledge of social relationships. I propose that these representations allow even infants to categorize relationships into a model (following relational models theory, i.e., communal sharing, authority ranking, or equality matching) and compute their strength (based on factors like expectation of future interaction, obligations, and commitment). Throughout the paper, I review evidence in support of this proposal and consider alternative explanations.
Abstract:
In the human mind, what is a social relationship, and what are the developmental origins of this representation? I consider findings from infant psychology and propose that our representations of social relationships are intuitive theories built on core knowledge. I propose three central components of this intuitive theory. The purpose of the first component is to recognize whether a relationship exists, the purpose of the second is to characterize the relationship by categorizing it into a model and to compute its strength (i.e., intensity, pull, or thickness), and the purpose of the third is to understand how to change relationships through explicit or implicit communication. I propose that infants possess core knowledge on which this intuitive theory is built. This paper focuses on the second component and considers evidence that infants characterize relationships. Following Relational Models Theory (A. P. Fiske, 1992, 2004) I propose that from infancy humans recognize relationships that belong to three models: communal sharing (where people are ‘one’), authority ranking (where people are ranked), and equality matching (where people are separate, but evenly balanced). I further propose that humans, and potentially infants, recognize a relationship’s strength which can be thought of as a continuous representation of obligations (the extent to which certain actions are expected), and commitment (the likelihood that people will continue the relationship). These representations and the assumption that others share them allow us to form, maintain, and change social relationships throughout our lives by informing how we interpret and evaluate the actions of others and plan our own.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

