Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Adler's Individual Psychology01:28

Adler's Individual Psychology

1.1K
Alfred Adler, a prominent figure in psychology, founded the school of individual psychology. In contrast to Freud's emphasis on sexual or aggressive motives, Adler suggested that individuals are primarily motivated by their purposes and goals. He believed that people strive for perfection rather than pleasure. Adler argued that individuals could creatively act upon their genetic inheritance and environmental experiences to shape their own lives, emphasizing conscious motivation over...
1.1K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.3K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.3K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.8K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.8K
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

63
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
63
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.4K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cognitive primitives, learning, and the structure of early social relationship cognition.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Cognitive representations of social relationships and their developmental origins.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024
Same author

Personalizing driver safety interfaces via driver cognitive factors inference.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Infants Infer Social Relationships Between Individuals Who Engage in Imitative Social Interactions.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2024
Same author

System circumvention: Dishonest-illegal transgressions are perceived as justified in non-meritocratic societies.

The British journal of social psychology·2024
Same author

Providers' Perspectives on Decision-Making About Care for Transgender Youth.

Transgender health·2023
Same journal

Expectations of Reciprocal Generosity Are Specific to Equal Relationships.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Resolving the Vagueness of Quantifiers With Explicit Expectations.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Where You Look Is What You Get: Individual Fixation Height Predicts Biases in Face Perception.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Response Time as a Proxy for Decision Confidence: Insights From Type-2 ROC Analysis.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Associations Between Second-Language Proficiency and Executive Functions in Autistic and Neurotypical Children.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Impact of Education and Music Training on the Development of Abstract Thinking in the First Years of Schooling.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 19, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.7K

Intuitive Sociology: Children Recognize Decision-Making Structures and Prefer Groups With Less-Concentrated Power.

Ashley J Thomas1, Vivian Mitchell2, Emily Sumner3

  • 1Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Open Mind : Discoveries in Cognitive Science
|November 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Children aged 6-8 understand different group decision-making structures, preferring shared decision-making. This early social reasoning ability is foundational for complex political and moral thought.

Keywords:
participatory decision-makingsocial developmentsocial hierarchysocial reasoning

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

787

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 19, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.7K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

787

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Social Cognition
  • Group Dynamics

Background:

  • Children recognize social groups early in development.
  • Group structures vary significantly in how decisions are made.
  • Understanding these structures is crucial for social interaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if children can recognize and differentiate between hierarchical and egalitarian group decision-making structures.
  • To determine if children exhibit preferences for specific group structures.
  • To explore the developmental trajectory of understanding social structures.

Main Methods:

  • Children aged 4-8 were presented with stories about two distinct camping groups: one hierarchical (one leader decides) and one egalitarian (all members decide).
  • Participants were not explicitly told about the groups' structures, assessing implicit recognition.
  • Children's preferences for interaction and inferences about group members' traits were recorded.

Main Results:

  • Children aged 6-8, but not 4-5, recognized the distinct decision-making structures of the two groups.
  • Older children preferred interacting with the egalitarian group where decisions were shared.
  • Children inferred that members of egalitarian groups would be more generous than those in hierarchical groups.

Conclusions:

  • Children's social reasoning includes the capacity to compare and evaluate different social structures from an early age.
  • The ability to distinguish and prefer certain group structures may be a precursor to complex political and moral reasoning.
  • Developmental changes in social cognition enable children to understand and navigate diverse social organizations.