Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025
Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
Published on: March 15, 2019
Effect of touch on proprioception: non-invasive trigeminal nerve stimulation suggests general arousal rather than
Justin Tanner1, Gerrit Orthlieb1, Stephen Helms Tillery1
1School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Introduction:
Proprioceptive error of estimated fingertip position in two-dimensional space is reduced with the addition of tactile stimulation applied at the fingertip. Tactile input does not disrupt the participants' estimation strategy, as the individual error vector maps maintain their overall structure. This relationship suggests integration of proprioception and tactile information improves proprioceptive estimation, which can also be improved with trained mental focus and attention. Task attention and arousal are physiologically regulated by the reticular activating system (RAS), a brainstem circuit including the locus coeruleus (LC). There is direct and indirect evidence that these structures can be modulated by non-invasive trigeminal nerve stimulation (nTNS), providing an opportunity to examine nTNS effect on the integrative relationship of proprioceptive and tactile information.
Methods:
Fifteen right-handed participants performed a simple right-handed proprioceptive estimation task with tactile feedback (touch) and no tactile (hover) feedback. Participants repeated the task after nTNS administration. Stimulation was delivered for 10 min, and stimulation parameters were 3,000 Hz, 50 μs pulse width, with a mean of 7 mA. Error maps across the workspace are generated using polynomial models of the participants' target responses.
Results:
Error maps did not demonstrate significant vector direction changes between conditions for any participant, indicating that nTNS does not disrupt spatial proprioception estimation strategies. A linear mixed model regression with nTNS epoch, tactile condition, and the interaction as factors demonstrated that nTNS reduced proprioceptive error under the hover condition only.
Discussion:
We argue that nTNS does not disrupt spatial proprioceptive error maps but can improve proprioceptive estimation in the absence of tactile feedback. However, we observe no evidence that nTNS enhances tactile-proprioceptive integration as the touch condition does not exhibit significantly reduced error after nTNS.
