Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Merging Absolute and Relative Quantitative PCR Data to Quantify STAT3 Splice Variant Transcripts
Published on: October 9, 2016
SpliceMutr Enables Pan-Cancer Analysis of Splicing-Derived Neoantigen Burden in Tumors.
Theron Palmer1,2, Michael D Kessler2,3, Xiaoshan M Shao1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Aberrant alternative splicing creates neoantigens that trigger immune responses. A new tool, SpliceMutr, identifies these splicing-derived neoantigens and reveals their link to antitumor immunity and immunotherapy response.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Bioinformatics
- Genomics
Background:
- Aberrant alternative splicing can generate neoantigens, potentially stimulating immune responses.
- Existing methods for quantifying splicing-derived neoantigens have limitations, including reliance on independent references and susceptibility to batch effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce SpliceMutr, a bioinformatics pipeline for identifying splicing-derived neoantigens from tumor and normal data.
- To analyze splicing antigenicity across The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and investigate its relationship with antitumor immunity and immunotherapy response.
Main Methods:
- Developed SpliceMutr, a computational pipeline for identifying tumor-specific antigenic splice variants.
- Predicted MHC-binding affinity and estimated splicing antigenicity scores per gene.
- Applied SpliceMutr to TCGA transcriptomic data and analyzed cohorts of melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Main Results:
- Identified splicing-derived neoantigens and antigenicity scores across cancer types, finding correlations with antitumor immunity biomarkers.
- Observed higher splicing antigenicity in tumors compared to normal tissues and in patients with mutations in splicing machinery genes.
- Found that splicing antigenicity changes in response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies, with increased antigenicity in responders and decreased antigenicity in non-responders (progressors).
Conclusions:
- SpliceMutr provides a novel computational approach for analyzing splicing antigenicity.
- Splicing antigenicity is higher in tumors, influenced by splicing machinery mutations, and associated with immunotherapy response.
- Further pan-cancer studies are needed to elucidate the interplay between splicing antigenicity and ICI response.
Related Concept Videos
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...

