Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Merging Absolute and Relative Quantitative PCR Data to Quantify STAT3 Splice Variant Transcripts
Published on: October 9, 2016
SpliceMutr Enables Pan-Cancer Analysis of Splicing-Derived Neoantigen Burden in Tumors
Theron Palmer1,2, Michael D Kessler2,3, Xiaoshan M Shao1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract:
Aberrant alternative splicing can generate neoantigens, which can themselves stimulate immune responses and surveillance. Previous methods for quantifying splicing-derived neoantigens are limited by independent references and potential batch effects. Here, we introduce SpliceMutr, a bioinformatics approach and pipeline for identifying splicing-derived neoantigens from tumor and normal data. SpliceMutr facilitates the identification of tumor-specific antigenic splice variants, predicts MHC-binding affinity, and estimates splicing antigenicity scores per gene. By applying this tool to transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we generate splicing-derived neoantigens and neoantigenicity scores per sample and across all cancer types and find numerous correlations between splicing antigenicity and well-established biomarkers of antitumor immunity. Notably, carriers of mutations within splicing machinery genes have higher splicing antigenicity, which provides support for our approach. Further analysis of splicing antigenicity in cohorts of patients with melanoma treated with mono- or combined immune checkpoint inhibition suggests that the abundance of splicing antigens is reduced post-treatment from baseline in patients who progress. We also observe increased splicing antigenicity in responders to immunotherapy, which may relate to an increased capacity to mount an immune response to splicing-derived antigens. We find the splicing antigenicity to be higher in tumor samples when compared with normal, that mutations in the splicing machinery result in increased splicing antigenicity in some cancers, and higher splicing antigenicity is associated with positive response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Furthermore, this new computational pipeline provides novel analytical capabilities for splicing antigenicity and is openly available for further immuno-oncology analysis.
Significance:
SpliceMutr shows that splicing antigenicity changes in response to ICI therapies and that native modulation of the splicing machinery through mutations increases the contribution of splicing to the neoantigen load of some The Cancer Genome Atlas cancer subtypes. Future studies of the relationship between splicing antigenicity and immune checkpoint inhibitor response pan-cancer are essential to establish the interplay between antigen heterogeneity and immunotherapy regimen on patient response.
Insights
Aberrant alternative splicing creates neoantigens that trigger immune responses. A new tool, SpliceMutr, identifies these splicing-derived neoantigens and reveals their link to antitumor immunity and immunotherapy response.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Bioinformatics
- Genomics
Background:
- Aberrant alternative splicing can generate neoantigens, potentially stimulating immune responses.
- Existing methods for quantifying splicing-derived neoantigens have limitations, including reliance on independent references and susceptibility to batch effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce SpliceMutr, a bioinformatics pipeline for identifying splicing-derived neoantigens from tumor and normal data.
- To analyze splicing antigenicity across The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and investigate its relationship with antitumor immunity and immunotherapy response.
Main Methods:
- Developed SpliceMutr, a computational pipeline for identifying tumor-specific antigenic splice variants.
- Predicted MHC-binding affinity and estimated splicing antigenicity scores per gene.
- Applied SpliceMutr to TCGA transcriptomic data and analyzed cohorts of melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Main Results:
- Identified splicing-derived neoantigens and antigenicity scores across cancer types, finding correlations with antitumor immunity biomarkers.
- Observed higher splicing antigenicity in tumors compared to normal tissues and in patients with mutations in splicing machinery genes.
- Found that splicing antigenicity changes in response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies, with increased antigenicity in responders and decreased antigenicity in non-responders (progressors).
Conclusions:
- SpliceMutr provides a novel computational approach for analyzing splicing antigenicity.
- Splicing antigenicity is higher in tumors, influenced by splicing machinery mutations, and associated with immunotherapy response.
- Further pan-cancer studies are needed to elucidate the interplay between splicing antigenicity and ICI response.
Related Concept Videos
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...

