Cerebral Embolic Protection by Geographic Region: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PROTECTED TAVR Randomized Clinical Trial
Raj R Makkar1, Aakriti Gupta1, Thomas E Waggoner2
1Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
JAMA Cardiology
|October 29, 2024
Summary
Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce stroke during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A post hoc analysis of the PROTECTED TAVR trial found CEP significantly reduced stroke in US patients but not in those outside the US.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Neurology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a key treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
- Embolic stroke is a risk during TAVR due to dislodged debris.
- Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices aim to mitigate this risk, but their efficacy is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate regional variations in the effectiveness of CEP devices in reducing stroke during TAVR.
- To analyze stroke outcomes associated with CEP utilization across different geographic cohorts.
Main Methods:
- Post hoc analysis of the prospective, postmarket, randomized PROTECTED TAVR trial.
- Inclusion of patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR at 51 centers in the US, Europe, and Australia.
- Comparison of stroke rates between TAVR with CEP and TAVR alone, stratified by geographic region (US vs. outside US).
Main Results:
- The overall PROTECTED TAVR trial showed no significant difference in stroke incidence between TAVR with CEP and TAVR alone.
- In a US cohort, TAVR with CEP demonstrated a 50% relative risk reduction in overall stroke and a 73% reduction in disabling stroke.
- No significant stroke risk reduction was observed in the outside US cohort.
Conclusions:
- The PROTECTED TAVR trial did not establish a significant benefit of CEP for periprocedural stroke reduction overall.
- This post hoc analysis suggests potential regional differences, with a trend toward greater stroke reduction in the US cohort.
- Further research is warranted to explore factors influencing CEP efficacy across different patient populations and procedural practices.


