Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomized clinical trials: problems and values.

M Moser

    The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    |March 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Combination therapy for hypertension: an update.

    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)·2003
    Same author

    Selection based on morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos at different stages of preimplantation development: a review.

    Human reproduction update·2003
    Same author

    Developmental competence of oocytes showing increased cytoplasmic viscosity.

    Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2003
    Same author

    Signal recognition particle-dependent protein targeting, universal to all kingdoms of life.

    Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology·2003
    Same author

    [Otorhinolaryngologic diseases and flying].

    Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2002
    Same author

    First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients.

    Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2002
    Same journal

    Rocuronium dosing for rapid sequence intubation: A retrospective analysis in ED and ICU settings.

    The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical features of adults with undiagnosed acute leukemia in the emergency department: A descriptive study.

    The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Occult intraperitoneal gynecological hemorrhage: An under-evaluated source of hemoperitoneum after blunt trauma.

    The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Racket and paddle sports-related injuries treated in United States emergency departments, 2000-2023.

    The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Prehospital epinephrine as a bridge to survival in traumatic cardiac arrest: A nationwide propensity score-matched analysis.

    The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Crowdsourcing technologies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest response: A scoping review.

    The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Randomization in clinical studies faces ethical and methodological challenges. While not statistically disadvantageous, its benefits are debated, raising concerns about patient care and resource allocation.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Trials Methodology
    • Medical Ethics
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Randomization is a cornerstone of clinical trial design, aiming to minimize bias.
    • Ethical concerns question if randomization compromises patient outcomes or causes harm.
    • Methodological critiques focus on the resource-intensive nature and selectivity of randomized studies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To categorize and discuss the primary ethical and methodological criticisms of randomization in research.
    • To address the perceived disadvantages and exaggerated advantages of randomization.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and critical analysis of existing arguments against randomization.
    • Categorization of criticisms into ethical and methodological frameworks.
    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Ethical criticisms center on potential patient harm and deprivation of optimal treatment.
    • Methodological criticisms highlight issues of time, cost, and study selectivity.
    • While statistical disadvantages are not inherent, the statistical benefits of randomization are perceived by some as overstated.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding these criticisms is crucial for refining randomization protocols and addressing stakeholder concerns.
    • Balancing the rigorous nature of randomization with practical and ethical considerations remains an ongoing challenge in clinical research.