Variation in the metagenomic analysis of fecal microbiome composition calls for a standardized operating approach

The reproducibility in microbiome studies is limited due to the lack of one gold-standard operating procedure. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of protocol variations on microbiome composition using metagenomic data sets from a single center. We assessed the variation in a data set consisted of 2,722 subjects, including 9 subcohorts harboring healthy subjects and patients with various disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, and type 2 diabetes. Two different DNA extraction kits, with or without lyticase, and two sample storage methods were compared. Our results indicated that DNA extraction had the largest impact on gut microbiota diversity among all host factors and sample operating procedures. Healthy subjects matched by age, body mass index, and sample operating methods exhibited reduced, yet significant differences (PERMANOVA, P < 0.05) in gut microbiota composition across studies. The variations contributed by DNA extraction were primarily driven by different recovery efficiency of gram-positive bacteria, e.g., phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. This was further confirmed by a parallel comparison of fecal samples from five healthy subjects and a standard mock community. In addition, the DNA extraction method influenced DNA biomass, quality, and the detection of specific lineage-associated diseases. Sample operating approach and batch effects should be considered for cohorts with large sample size or longitudinal cohorts to ensure that source data were appropriately generated and analyzed. Comparison between samples processed with inconsistent methods should be dealt with caution. This study will promote the establishment of a sample operating standard to enhance our understanding of microbiome and translating in clinical practice.IMPORTANCEThe reproducibility of human gut microbiome studies has been suboptimal across cohorts and study design choices. One possible reason for the disagreement is the introduction of systemic biases due to differences in methodologies. In our study, we utilized microbial metagenomic data sets from 2,722 fecal samples generated from a single research center to examine the extent to which sample storage and DNA extraction influence the quantification of microbial composition and compared this variable with other sources of technical and biological variation. Our research highlights the impact of DNA extraction methods when analyzing microbiome data and suggests that the microbiome profile may be influenced by differences in the extraction efficiency of bacterial species. With metagenomics sequencing being increasingly used in clinical biology, our findings provide insight into the challenges using metagenomics sequencing in clinical diagnostics, where the detection of certain species and its abundance relative to a "healthy reference" is key.