Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways01:22

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

5.7K
At the molecular level, visual signals trigger transformations in photopigment molecules, resulting in changes in the photoreceptor cell's membrane potential. The photon's energy level is denoted by its wavelength, with each specific wavelength of visible light associated with a distinct color. The spectral range of visible light, classified as electromagnetic radiation, spans from 380 to 720 nm. Electromagnetic radiation wavelengths exceeding 720 nm fall under the infrared category,...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Standard Amblyopia Therapy in Adults with Longstanding Amblyopia Improves Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2023
Same author

Contrast Sensitivity in Early to Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD).

Current eye research·2021
Same author

A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2019
Same author

Comparison of contrast sensitivity in macaque monkeys and humans.

Visual neuroscience·2019
Same journal

The relationship between foveal anatomy and retinal function in oculocutaneous albinism.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Early onset primary angle closure and foveal retinoschisis associated with a pseudo-homozygous CRB1 pathogenic variant.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Bilateral perifoveal macular ischemia in non-proliferative Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated retinopathy: a case report.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Association between dynamic pupil parameters and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Structure-function relationship between handheld photopic negative response and macular GCIPL thickness in chronic optic neuropathy.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Clinical course of a patient with PRSS56-associated nanophthalmos (isolated microphthalmia) and uveal effusion syndrome.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Electrophysiological Methods for Measuring Photopigment Levels in Drosophila Photoreceptors
08:09

Electrophysiological Methods for Measuring Photopigment Levels in Drosophila Photoreceptors

Published on: June 2, 2022

2.2K

A modified analysis protocol for the PhNR test.

William H Ridder1, Jeffrey D Farmer2

  • 1Southern California College of Optometry, Marshall B. Ketchum University, 2575 Yorba Linda Blvd, Fullerton, CA, 92831, USA. wridder@ketchum.edu.

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|October 30, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A modified photopic negative response (PhNR) protocol demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma. This enhanced method offers greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting glaucomatous damage compared to the standard protocol.

Keywords:
ElectroretinogramGlaucomaPhotopic negative response (PhNR)Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

12.3K
Simultaneous ex vivo Functional Testing of Two Retinas by in vivo Electroretinogram System
09:16

Simultaneous ex vivo Functional Testing of Two Retinas by in vivo Electroretinogram System

Published on: May 6, 2015

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Electrophysiological Methods for Measuring Photopigment Levels in Drosophila Photoreceptors
08:09

Electrophysiological Methods for Measuring Photopigment Levels in Drosophila Photoreceptors

Published on: June 2, 2022

2.2K
Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

12.3K
Simultaneous ex vivo Functional Testing of Two Retinas by in vivo Electroretinogram System
09:16

Simultaneous ex vivo Functional Testing of Two Retinas by in vivo Electroretinogram System

Published on: May 6, 2015

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Glaucoma patients often exhibit abnormal photopic negative response (PhNR) results.
  • The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) established an extended protocol for PhNR in 2018.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic performance of the ISCEV extended PhNR (I-PhNR) protocol with a modified PhNR (M-PhNR) protocol.
  • To evaluate the M-PhNR protocol's effectiveness in detecting glaucomatous damage.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty subjects (12 glaucoma patients, 10 glaucoma suspects, 8 normal controls) underwent PhNR testing using a Diagnosys E3 mobile system.
  • The M-PhNR protocol incorporated a 5-45 Hz bandpass filter and an objective sweep-selection parameter, differing from the standard I-PhNR protocol.
  • Measurements included PhNR relative to baseline, a-wave and b-wave amplitudes, and their ratios, analyzed using coefficients of variation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and t-tests.

Main Results:

  • The M-PhNR protocol significantly reduced intra-subject and inter-subject coefficients of variation for glaucoma subjects.
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed a larger area under the curve (AUC) for the M-PhNR protocol compared to the I-PhNR.
  • The M-PhNR protocol demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity in identifying glaucoma.

Conclusions:

  • The M-PhNR protocol effectively reduces data variability, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma.
  • The M-PhNR protocol shows significant promise as a superior diagnostic tool for glaucoma detection compared to the I-PhNR protocol.