Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Storage01:23

Storage

71
A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze...
71

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic Images for Mild Cognitive Impairment Are Sensitive to Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers and Reveal Abnormal Scene Processing.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Reverse engineering what makes a symbol memorable.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

What divides and unites our memories: Multifactor trial-wise predictions of memory across 6+ million trials.

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

Semantic centrality and emotional valence contribute to word memorability in an associative memory task for Chinese words.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Correction: Scene image memorability is learnable via feedback.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Challenging dual-coding theory: Picture superiority effects persist in aphantasia.

Neuropsychologia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.0K

Drawings reveal changes in object memory, but not spatial memory, across time.

Emma Megla1, Samuel R Rosenthal1, Wilma A Bainbridge2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Cognition
|October 30, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Memory for object details fades over time, but spatial memory remains accurate. This suggests distinct memory systems for objects and space, with object recall influenced by location and saliency.

Keywords:
False memoryLong-term memoryMemory recallScene perceptionVisual memoryVisual processing

More Related Videos

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

10.8K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.0K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

10.8K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Memory is known to degrade over time, leading to loss of details and generalization.
  • Encoding limitations can result in remembering only the gist of information.
  • Understanding how different memory components change over time is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify how specific features of memory content change over time.
  • To investigate the impact of encoding duration and retention intervals on memory accuracy.
  • To determine if object and spatial memory are differentially affected by time.

Main Methods:

  • Crowdsourced scoring of hundreds of memory-based drawings.
  • Experiments involving variable encoding durations and retention periods.
  • Analysis of recalled object proportions, false recall rates, and spatial accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Object recall proportion and false recall significantly decreased with time.
  • Spatial memory accuracy remained high and was relatively independent of time.
  • Object recall predictability was linked to object location, meaning, and saliency.
  • Time differentially impacted object and spatial memory components.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence supports a dissociation between object and spatial memory systems.
  • Spatial memory appears more robust against temporal degradation than object memory.
  • The findings provide insights into the temporal dynamics of memory consolidation and retrieval.