Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

21:16
An In Vitro Skin Irritation Test SIT using the EpiDerm Reconstructed Human Epidermal RHE Model
Published on: July 13, 2009
67.7K
Borderline Range Determined Using Data From Validation Study of Alternative Methods for Skin Sensitization: ADRA,
Toshihiko Kasahara1, Yusuke Yamamoto1, Natsumi Nakashima1
1Safety Evaluation Center, Fujifilm Corporation, Minamiashigara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Journal of Applied Toxicology : JAT
|October 30, 2024
Summary
This study clarifies the calculation of borderline ranges (BRs) for alternative methods in animal testing, ensuring reliable predictions by addressing data variability near cutoff values. The methods used were found adequate compared to existing guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology and Chemical Safety
- In vitro testing methodologies
- Regulatory science
Background:
- Predictive models for alternative methods often use binary classifications with cutoff values.
- Data variability near cutoff values can lead to ambiguous results in alternative testing.
- The OECD GL497 guideline employs a borderline range (BR) statistical method to manage this ambiguity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the specific statistical methods used for calculating borderline ranges (BRs) as per OECD GL497.
- To provide a detailed understanding of BR calculation for improved application of alternative testing methods.
- To validate the adequacy of calculated BRs by comparing them with established methods.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the scale-constant correction method to compute median absolute deviation (MAD) around the median.
- Applied the bottom-raised transformation method to handle zero values, enabling logarithmic data transformation for BR calculation.
- Calculated BRs for the amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA), interleukin-8 reporter gene assay (IL-8 Luc), and epidermal sensitization assay (EpiSensA) using validation study data.
Main Results:
- Established specific BRs for ADRA (4.1–5.9) and IL-8 Luc (1.25–1.57).
- Determined BRs for four genes in EpiSensA: ATF3 (10.71–21.02), GCLM (1.64–2.45), DNAJB4 (1.61–2.52), and IL-8 (3.11–5.16).
- The deviations between BR limits and cutoff values were comparable to those of guideline methods (DPRA, KerarinoSens, h-CLAT).
Conclusions:
- The clarified methods for calculating BRs provide a robust approach to managing data variability in alternative testing.
- The established BRs for ADRA, IL-8 Luc, and EpiSensA are adequate and comparable to existing regulatory methods.
- This work enhances the reliability and applicability of alternative methods in toxicological assessments, supporting the reduction of animal testing.
Keywords:
ADRA (amino acid derivative reactivity assay)BR (borderline range)EpiSensA (epidermal sensitization assay)IL‐8 Luc (interleukin‐8 reporter gene assay)MAD (median absolute deviation)MADp (pooled median absolute deviation)NAC (N‐(2‐(1‐naphthyl)acetyl)‐L‐cysteine)NAL (α‐N‐(2‐(1‐naphthyl)acetyl)‐L‐lysine)
