Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Functional Assessment of the Donor Heart During Ex Situ Perfusion: Insights from Pressure-Volume Loops and Surface Echocardiography
Published on: October 11, 2022
Different degrees of summed difference perfusion score in women: influence on the prognostic variables associated
Guillermo Romero-Farina1,2,3,4,5, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix1,2,3, Ignacio Ferreira-González5,6
1Nuclear Cardiology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Objective:
Evaluating the predictive models (PM) for a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) only in women with abnormal summed difference score (SDS ≥ 1), borderline myocardial ischemia (borderline-MIsch: SDS = 1), MIsch (SDS ≥ 2), mild-MIsch (SDS = 2-4), and moderate-severe MIsch (ms-MIsch: SDS ≥ 5).
Methods:
Between January 2000 and January 2018, of 25 943 consecutive patients who underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (gSPECT-MPI) for coronary risk stratification; 717 women (age 68.37 ± 3.4 years) with an abnormal SDS ≥ 1 were included. During the follow-up (mean 4 ± 2.9 years) post-gSPECT-MPI, MACE (unstable angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiac death) was assessed.
Results:
In the global women cohort with abnormal SDS ( n = 717), the PM was angina [hazard ratio (HR): 1.65, P = 0.016], diabetes (HR: 1.72, P = 0.004), beta-blockers (HR: 1.61, P = 0.009), pharmacological stress (HR: 1.74, P = 0.007), ↓ segment (ST) mm ≥ 1 (HR: 1.54, P = 0.039), and moderate-to-severe abnormal summed stress score (ms-SSS) (HR: 2.92, P = 0.001). In borderline-MIsch group ( n = 208), the PM was previous myocardial infarction (HR: 3.8, P = 0.001), nitrates (HR: 2.13, P = 0.047), pharmacological stress (HR: 4.81, P < 0.001), and ↓ST mm ≥ 1 (HR: 3.07, P = 0.014). In MIsch group ( n = 509), the PM model was ms-SSS (HR: 2.25, P = 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.73, P = 0.011), angina (HR: 1.68, P = 0.029), beta-blockers (HR: 1.59, P = 0.026), and ms-MIsch (HR: 1.62, P = 0.044). In mild-MIsch group ( n = 399), the PM was ms-SSS (HR: 2.55, P = 0.003), diabetes (HR: 2.17, P = 0.004), angina (HR: 1.89, P = 0.037), and beta-blockers (HR: 2.01, P = 0.011). In ms-MIsch group ( n = 110), the predictive variable for MACE was ms-SSS (HR: 2.27, P = 0.016). The ms-SSS significantly increases the prognostic value of the ms-MIsch ( P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Women with different degrees of abnormal SDS have different PMs of MACE. The ms-SSS stands out as the most significant predictive variable.
More Related Videos
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
06:22Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Research — Tailored Langendorff Perfusion Techniques for Improved Experimental Outcomes
Published on: June 14, 2024
