Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

10.4K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
10.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Safety of antibiotic audit and feedback: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Updated International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS version 5.0): modified Delphi, evidence informed consensus process.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

The impacts of caring for children with inherited metabolic diseases for families: a cross-sectional study.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

The future of vaccination: Innovations emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

Vaccination attitudes and intentions reported by Canadian children and their parents in the CHILD Cohort Study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BMC public health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

An Online Application to Explain Community Immunity with Personalized Avatars: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hina Hakim1,2,3, Julie A Bettinger4,5, Christine T Chambers6,7

  • 1Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences
|November 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A web-based avatar intervention effectively increased understanding of community immunity (herd immunity), boosting risk perception and vaccine intentions, especially in collectivist individuals. Personalized avatars can enhance public health messaging.

Keywords:
Community immunityData VisualizationDigital HealthHerd immunityRandomized Controlled TrialVaccinationVaccination HesitancyVisualization

More Related Videos

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
07:29

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

8.2K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
07:29

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

8.2K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Communication
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Community immunity, also known as herd immunity, is crucial for controlling vaccine-preventable diseases.
  • Understanding community immunity is complex and can be challenging to communicate effectively to the public.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a web-based, personalized avatar intervention designed to convey the concept of community immunity.
  • To assess the intervention's impact on risk perception, emotions, knowledge, and vaccination intentions across four vaccine-preventable diseases.

Main Methods:

  • A 2x4 factorial randomized controlled trial involving 3883 Canadian adults.
  • Development of a web application ('herdimm') using personalized avatars and animations to illustrate disease spread with and without community immunity.
  • Comparison of the intervention group with a control group, analyzing primary outcomes (objective and subjective risk perception) and secondary outcomes (emotions, knowledge, vaccination intentions).

Main Results:

  • The 'herdimm' intervention significantly increased objective risk perception (58.0% vs. 38.2%) and subjective risk perception (5.54 vs. 5.30).
  • Participants in the intervention group showed increased emotions (worry, anticipated guilt), knowledge, and vaccination intentions compared to the control group.
  • The positive effects of the intervention were more pronounced in individuals with collectivist orientations and sometimes negative in those with individualist orientations.

Conclusions:

  • Web-based personalized avatar interventions can effectively enhance understanding of community immunity and promote positive health behaviors.
  • Public health campaigns should consider tailoring messages about collective benefits to resonate with different cultural orientations, particularly collectivism.
  • Personalized avatar interventions show promise for improving risk perception and vaccination intentions, especially among collectivist populations.