Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
Published on: May 11, 2020
Robotic assistance for upper cervical instrumentation: report on accuracy and safety
Kaihang Luo1, Xuenong Zou1, Wei Chen2
1Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Purpose:
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and safety of C1 lateral mass and upper cervical pedicle screw placement assisted by the TiRobot II system.
Methods:
Ten patients who underwent cervical spine surgery assisted by the TiRobot II system were included. Screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and by comparing the final screw positions with pre-planned trajectories. Deviations in screw tip, tail, and angle were recorded. Clinical data, including symptoms, surgical outcomes, and postoperative follow-up, were collected. Neurological improvement was evaluated using pre- and post-operative mJOA scores, with recovery rates calculated by Hirabayashi's method to assess outcomes 3 months after surgery.
Results:
A total of 30 screws were placed in 10 patients. All screws (30/30) were within the clinically acceptable range, with 93.33% (28 screws) classified as Grade A and 6.67% (2 screws) as Grade B. In the sagittal plane, the average tip deviation was 1.82 ± 0.79 mm, tail deviation 1.64 ± 0.60 mm, and angular deviation 1.92 ± 1.39°. In the axial plane, tip deviation was 1.96 ± 0.87 mm, tail deviation 1.92 ± 0.65 mm, and angular deviation 2.01 ± 1.07°. The average surgery time was 318.80 ± 66.07 min, with a mean EBL of 205.00 ± 55.03 mL. Postoperative mJOA scores significantly improved from 8.10 ± 1.97 to 12.60 ± 1.78 (p < 0.05), with a 52 ± 14% recovery rate. All patients showed significant symptom improvement.
Conclusion:
The TiRobot II system demonstrates the capability to precisely execute pre-planned trajectories and improves the accuracy and safety of C1 lateral mass and upper cervical screw placement.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Accuracy and Precision
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Accuracy and Precision

