Effectiveness and sustainability of a multidisciplinary care model for patients with hemodialysis access dysfunction

A multidisciplinary care model involving the interventional radiologist, vascular surgeon, interventional nephrologist, renal advanced nurse practitioner, and renal coordinators was implemented to improve the care for the patient admitted with dysfunctional hemodialysis access. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of this multidisciplinary care model.

A dedicated interventional nephrology suite was established to perform endovascular procedures for patients admitted with hemodialysis access dysfunction via the emergency department of the hospital. We retrospectively collected data from electronic medical records 1-year before and after the implementation (April 2015). Outcome measures include waiting time for intervention, length of stays (LOS), number of dialysis catheter insertions before the intervention, number of inpatient dialysis required, and success rates of the interventions. The waiting time for intervention and LOS was tracked over the next 3 years to determine the sustainability of the care model.

Eight hundred eighty-one endovascular interventions (314 angioplasties, 567 thrombolysis) were performed on 554 patients. Post-implementation, a greater proportion of intervention was performed within 24 h (238 (50.2%) vs 70 (17.2%), p < 0.001) with lesser proportion of patients requiring bridging hemodialysis via temporary catheter, 156 (32.9%) versus 215 (52.8%), p < 0.001. A shorter median LOS and days-to-intervention were reported, 3 (IQR 2-6) versus 5 days (IQR 3-8), p < 0.001 and 1 (IQR 1-2) versus 3 days (IQR 2-4), p < 0.001 respectively. Less hemodialysis session/patient required, 2 (IQR 1-3) versus 3 (IQR 2-4), p < 0.001. The procedural success rate was greater, 440 (92.8%) versus 355 (87.2%), p = 0.020. Three years following implementation, the proportion of patients who received intervention within 24 h and were discharged within 48 h was reported to be persistently greater, 43% versus 13%, p < 0.001, and 27% versus 6%, p < 0.001 respectively.

This multi-disciplinary collaboration demonstrated a sustainable care model in improving the delivery of healthcare services for patients with dysfunctional hemodialysis access.