Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision making in laboratory test studies.

J B McCabe

    Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Evaluating laboratory tests involves assessing their operational and decision-making usefulness. This analysis, crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy, is often hindered by data limitations and a lack of physician understanding of quantitative models.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Emphysematous cystitis: rapid resolution of symptoms with hyperbaric treatment: a case report.

    Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc·2004
    Same author

    N-terminal protein acylation confers localization to cholesterol, sphingolipid-enriched membranes but not to lipid rafts/caveolae.

    Molecular biology of the cell·2001
    Same author

    Emergency department overcrowding: a national crisis.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same author

    Imaging evaluation of suspected ankle fractures. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

    Radiology·2000
    Same author

    Cervical spine trauma. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

    Radiology·2000
    Same author

    Diagnostic imaging of avascular necrosis of the hip. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

    Radiology·2000
    Same journal

    Why Dispelling Myths and Misconceptions in Emergency Medicine Matters.

    Emergency medicine clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Myths and Misconceptions in Emergency Medicine.

    Emergency medicine clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Acute Otitis Media-Watch and Wait Is Not a Myth.

    Emergency medicine clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Hot or Not? Myths and Misconceptions About Antipyretics for Pediatric Fever.

    Emergency medicine clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Epinephrine Improves Outcomes in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests.

    Emergency medicine clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Myth: Pretreatment Prevents Intravenous Contrast Reactions in the Emergency Department.

    Emergency medicine clinics of North America·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical laboratory science
    • Clinical diagnostics

    Background:

    • Laboratory test evaluation traditionally focuses on technical performance.
    • Operational and decision-making usefulness are critical yet often overlooked aspects of test analysis.
    • Quantitative models exist but face practical application challenges.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a general understanding of quantitative models for laboratory test evaluation.
    • To highlight the importance of operational and decision-making usefulness in diagnostic testing.
    • To improve the diagnostic application of laboratory tests through better model comprehension.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of quantitative models for evaluating laboratory tests.
    • Discussion of mathematical principles underlying these models.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of barriers to model application.

    • Main Results:

    • Quantitative models for test evaluation are available but underutilized.
    • Lack of precise probability, sensitivity, and specificity data hinders model application.
    • Physician understanding of decision-making processes impacts test utility.

    Conclusions:

    • Improved understanding of quantitative models can enhance laboratory test utility.
    • Addressing data limitations and physician education is key to better test application.
    • Focusing on operational and decision-making usefulness is vital for effective laboratory diagnostics.