Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Complete and Partial Aortic Occlusion for the Treatment of Hemorrhagic Shock in Swine
Published on: August 24, 2018
Carotid versus axillary artery cannulation for descending aorta remodeling in type A acute aortic dissection
Qin Jiang1, Tao Yu2, Ke-Li Huang3
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China. jq349@163.com.
Background:
Arterial cannulation sites for the surgical repair of type A aortic dissection (AAD) have evolved from right axillary artery (AA) cannulation to bilateral carotid artery (CA) based of femoral artery (FA) cannulation. Postoperative descending aorta remodeling is closely linked to the false lumen area ratio (FLAR), defined as false lumen area/aortic area, as well as to the incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT).
Aim:
To investigate the effect of the updated arterial cannulation strategy on descending aortic remodeling.
Methods:
A total of 443 AAD patients who received FA combined cannulation between March 2015 and March 2023 were included in the study. Of these, 209 received right AA cannulation and 234 received bilateral CA cannulation. The primary outcome was the change in FLAR, as calculated from computed tomography angiography in three segments of the descending aorta: Thoracic (S1), upper abdominal (S2), and lower abdominal (S3). Secondary outcomes were the incidence of RRT and the serum inflammation response, as observed by the levels of high sensitivity C reaction protein (hs-CRP) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6).
Results:
The postoperative/preoperative ratio of FLAR in S2 and S3 was higher in the AA group compared to the CA group (S2: 0.80 ± 0.08 vs 0.75 ± 0.07, P < 0.001; S3: 0.57 ± 0.12 vs 0.50 ± 0.12, P < 0.001, respectively). The AA group also had a significantly higher incidence of RRT (19.1% vs 8.5%, P = 0.001; odds ratio: 2.533, 95%CI: 1.427-4.493) and higher levels of inflammation cytokines 24 h after the procedure [hr-CRP: 117 ± 17 vs 104 ± 15 mg/L; IL-6: 129 (103, 166) vs 83 (69, 101) pg/mL; both P < 0.001] compared to the CA group.
Conclusion:
The CA cannulation strategy was associated with better abdominal aorta remodeling after AAD repair compared to AA cannulation, as observed by a greater change in FLAR and lower incidence of RRT.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

