Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

91
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
91
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

251
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
251
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

31.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.2K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

42.5K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
42.5K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

128
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
128
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

19.1K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
19.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Virulence gains in the Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici PstS10 lineage correlate with expression polymorphism in a candidate Avr effector.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Definitive Airway Management in the Critical Care Transport Medicine Environment: An Exploratory Convenience Survey-Based Analysis of Retrieval Experts on the Profound Shock State Patient.

Air medical journal·2026
Same author

The UK Standing Dental Advisory Committee (1948-2010) with special reference to its Expert Working Party on Orthodontics, 1992.

British dental journal·2026
Same author

PIEZO1-mediated calcium signaling reinforces mechanical properties of hair follicle stem cells to promote quiescence.

Science advances·2025
Same author

A Case Report of Anesthesia-induced Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine·2024
Same author

A brief history of the development and use of vulcanised rubber in dentistry.

British dental journal·2023
Same journal

Transferring ways of thinking and mathematizing: The statistical approach between physics and biology.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

920

Modus Darwin redux.

Christopher Stephens1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, 1866 Main Mall E370, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|November 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates arguments for common ancestry versus separate ancestry. It generalizes Elliott Sober's (modus Darwin) approach to support common ancestry even when traits of separate ancestors are probabilistically dependent.

Keywords:
BiogeographyCommon ancestryDarwinLaw of likelihoodSoberWallace

More Related Videos

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

18.3K
A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster
07:19

A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 30, 2015

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

920
Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

18.3K
A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster
07:19

A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 30, 2015

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Biophilosophy

Background:

  • Evaluating arguments for common ancestry versus separate ancestry is crucial in evolutionary biology.
  • Elliott Sober's "modus Darwin" likelihood reconstruction assumes probabilistic independence of traits in separate ancestors.
  • Historical naturalist models (Geoffroy, Owen) proposed probabilistically dependent traits in separate ancestors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address limitations in Sober's modus Darwin by considering probabilistically dependent traits in separate ancestors.
  • To generalize Sober's approach to accommodate trait dependency.
  • To evaluate Helgeson's criticisms and alternative interpretations of Darwin's reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a generalized likelihood reconstruction of Darwin's reasoning.
  • Proved that similarity matching can favor common ancestry even with dependent traits.
  • Analyzed and responded to Helgeson's criticisms of Sober's approach.

Main Results:

  • A generalized model supports common ancestry over separate ancestry even when traits of separate ancestors are probabilistically dependent.
  • The generalization accommodates historical naturalist views where trait dependency was considered.
  • Sober's approach is defended against Helgeson's objections.

Conclusions:

  • The generalized approach strengthens the evidential power of trait similarity for common ancestry.
  • This framework offers a more robust evaluation of evolutionary hypotheses, incorporating trait dependency.
  • The study reaffirms the validity of likelihood-based reasoning in evolutionary inference.