Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vision and reading disability: research problems.

H D Simons, J D Grisham

    Journal of the American Optometric Association
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An analysis of the role of vision anomalies in reading interference.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1993
    Same author

    Visual symptoms and reading performance.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1993
    Same author

    Vergence orthoptics: validity and persistence of the training effect.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1991
    Same author

    Vision anomalies and reading skill: a meta-analysis of the literature.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same author

    Visual therapy results for convergence insufficiency: a literature review.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same author

    The reading process and learning to read.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·1987
    Same journal

    Visual skills profiles.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
    Same journal

    Dark adaptation and night blindness.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
    Same journal

    Scleral tonometry.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
    Same journal

    Staying in shape: the different roads to fitness for busy optometrists.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
    Same journal

    Hiring a new optometrist? Be prepared!

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
    Same journal

    Late traumatic intraocular lens extrusion after penetrating keratoplasty.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
    See all related articles

    Methodological flaws in vision and reading disability studies can lead to inaccurate results. Careful subject selection, vision correction, and appropriate statistical analysis are crucial for reliable findings in reading research.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Educational Psychology

    Background:

    • The relationship between vision and reading disability is complex and often debated.
    • Previous studies have yielded conflicting results, suggesting potential methodological issues.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically review and analyze methodological problems in studies examining the link between vision and reading disability.
    • To identify common pitfalls that can lead to inaccurate research findings.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic review and critical analysis of existing research methodologies.
    • Identification of factors contributing to false positive and false negative results.

    Main Results:

    • False positives can arise from issues in subject selection, uncorrected vision problems, inappropriate comparison groups, unskilled testers, small sample sizes, and flawed data analysis.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • False negatives may result from experimenter bias, lack of comparison groups, specific statistical approaches, use of clinical samples, and failure to exclude alternative explanations.

    • Conclusions:

    • Methodological rigor is paramount in vision and reading disability research.
    • Addressing these identified issues is essential for advancing our understanding of reading development and difficulties.