Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2025
06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
Alluring or Alarming? The Polarizing Effect of Forbidden Knowledge in Political Discourse
V A Parker1, E Kehoe2, J Lees3
1Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|November 6, 2024
Summary
Political polarization influences how people perceive censored information. Conservatives were more drawn to suppressed COVID-19 claims, while liberals showed less interest when information was framed as forbidden knowledge.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Political Science
- Communication Studies
Background:
- "Forbidden knowledge" claims, suggesting information is censored or suppressed, are central to conspiracy theories.
- Such claims can be perceived as alluring or alarming, influenced by individuals' political worldviews.
- Little systematic research has explored the psychological impact of forbidden knowledge claims.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how framing controversial information, specifically related to COVID-19, as "forbidden knowledge" affects political conservatives and liberals.
- To examine the differential interpretations of information suppression motives across the political spectrum.
- To assess the impact of forbidden knowledge frames on critical thinking and belief formation.
Main Methods:
- Three studies (N = 2363) were conducted, with two being preregistered.
- Participants were exposed to COVID-19 claims framed as either censored or not censored.
- Methods included measuring attraction to, belief in, interpretation of suppression motives, and critical thinking errors in risk reasoning tasks.
Main Results:
- Conservatives showed greater attraction to and belief in censored COVID-19 claims, irrespective of the censorship framing.
- Liberals demonstrated decreased interest and belief when information was presented as censored.
- Liberals interpreted suppression as indicating harmful or false information, while conservatives viewed it as valuable and true.
- Conservatives exhibited more critical thinking errors in vaccine risk assessment when information was framed as censored.
Conclusions:
- Framing information as "forbidden knowledge" has polarizing effects, exacerbating political divides.
- Political worldview significantly moderates the reception and interpretation of suppressed information.
- The study highlights how censorship perceptions can influence belief, reasoning, and critical evaluation, particularly within partisan contexts.
Related Concept Videos
01:01Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
01:34Groupthink
44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
01:29Potential Due to a Polarized Object
367
A neutral atom consists of a positively charged nucleus surrounded by a negatively charged electron cloud. When placed in an external electric field, the external electric force pulls the electrons and nucleus apart, opposite to the intrinsic attraction between the nucleus and the electrons. The opposing forces balance each other with a slight shift between the center of masses of the nucleus and the electron cloud, resulting in a polarized atom. On the other hand, a few molecules, like water,...
367
03:26Framing Effects
7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
02:09Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.5K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.5K
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
32.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.5K