Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Metal-Free Custom-Made Zirconia Implants-A Prospective 5-Year Follow-Up Single-Arm Clinical Trial
Jantien H W de Beus1,2, Marco S Cune3,4, Henny J A Meijer2,3
1Department of Periodontology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, Groningen, Netherlands.
The 5-year survival rate for custom-made zirconia (ZrO2) dental implants was 75.8%, which is clinically unacceptable. Further research into mechanical failures is recommended before widespread clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Prosthodontics
Background:
- Zirconia (ZrO2) dental implants offer potential advantages over titanium due to biocompatibility and aesthetics.
- However, limited long-term clinical data exists to support the success of zirconia implants.
- This study investigates the clinical performance of custom-made two-piece zirconia implants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the 5-year survival and success rates of custom-made zirconia implants in the maxillary premolar region.
- To identify factors influencing implant performance, including handling and occlusal scheme.
- To assess the performance of the implant-supported lithium disilicate crowns.
Main Methods:
- A prospective 5-year follow-up clinical trial involving 30 custom-made zirconia implants in 31 patients.
- Assessment of clinical performance, marginal bone-level changes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, stratified by implant handling and occlusal scheme.
Main Results:
- The 5-year survival and success rates for the custom-made ZV3 implants were 75.8% and 71.0%, respectively.
- No significant differences in survival rates were observed based on implant handling or occlusal scheme.
- Patient satisfaction was high (91.7%) for implants in function, with no crown failures reported.
Conclusions:
- The observed survival rate of these ZV3 zirconia implants was lower than anticipated and not clinically acceptable.
- The study does not recommend ZV3 implant placement as applied in this context for clinical practice.
- Further research into mechanical failures of zirconia implants is crucial before larger trials.
More Related Videos
12:19Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
Published on: July 1, 2013
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021