Mark3D - A semi-automated open-source toolbox for 3D head- surface reconstruction and electrode position registration...

Source localization in EEG necessitates co-registering the EEG sensor locations with the subject's MRI, where EEG sensor locations are typically captured using electromagnetic tracking or 3D scanning of the subject's head with EEG cap, using commercially available 3D scanners. Both methods have drawbacks, where, electromagnetic tracking is slow and immobile, while 3D scanners are expensive. Photogrammetry offers a cost-effective alternative but requires multiple photos to sample the head, with good spatial sampling to adequately reconstruct the head surface. Post-reconstruction, the existing tools for electrode position labelling on the 3D head-surface have limited visual feedback and do not easily accommodate customized montages, which are typical in multi-modal measurements. We introduce Mark3D, an open-source, integrated tool for 3D head-surface reconstruction from phone camera video. It eliminates the need for keeping track of spatial sampling during image capture for video-based photogrammetry reconstruction. It also includes blur detection algorithms, a user-friendly interface for electrode and tracking, and integrates with popular toolboxes such as FieldTrip and MNE Python. The accuracy of the proposed method was benchmarked with the head-surface derived from a commercially available handheld 3D scanner Einscan-Pro + (Shining 3D Inc.,) which we treat as the "ground truth". We used reconstructed head-surfaces of ground truth (G1) and phone camera video (M₁₀₈₀) to mark the EEG electrode locations in 3D space using a dedicated UI provided in the tool. The electrode locations were then used to form pseudo-specific MRI templates for individual subjects to reconstruct source information. Somatosensory source activations in response to vibrotactile stimuli were estimated and compared between G1 and M₁₀₈₀. The mean positional errors of the EEG electrodes between G1 and M₁₀₈₀ in 3D space were found to be 0.09 ± 0.01 mm across different cortical areas, with temporal and occipital areas registering a relatively higher error than other regions such as frontal, central or parietal areas. The error in source reconstruction was found to be 0.033 ± 0.016 mm and 0.037 ± 0.017 mm in the left and right cortical hemispheres respectively.