Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Outcomes of mitral valve repair in ischemic mitral regurgitation: A two-decade experience
Lokeswara Rao Sajja1,2, Gopichand Mannam1, Aditya Koppula2,3
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Star Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Objective:
The study objective was to evaluate long-term survival outcomes after mitral valve repair in patients with moderate or moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 212 consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve repair with restrictive annuloplasty and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting for ischemic mitral regurgitation and coronary artery disease at a tertiary center between January 2005 and May 2025. Survival at 1, 5, 10, 12, and 20 years was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Differential survivals were compared using hazard ratios for the following variables: age more than 65 years, sex, diabetes, residual postoperative mitral regurgitation, incomplete revascularization, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, left ventricular end-systolic diameter 45 mm or greater, and preoperative renal dysfunction (serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL).
Results:
Of 212 patients, survival at 1, 5, 10, 12, and 20 years was 97.6%, 94.3%, 88.7%, 87.3%, and 81.1%, respectively. At 12 years, survival was significantly lower in patients with diabetes (82.1% vs 93% in nondiabetic patients; hazard ratio, 2.79 [1.18-6.61], P = .0197), residual mitral regurgitation (51.7% vs 92.9%; hazard ratio, 9.29 [4.30-20.04], P < .0001), and incomplete revascularization (38.9% vs 92.3%; hazard ratio, 11.19 [5.14-24.33], P < .0001). At 20 years, survival remained lower in diabetic patients (71.4% vs 93%; hazard ratio, 3.73 [1.71-8.12], P = .000933), patients with residual mitral regurgitation (51.7% vs 89.1%; hazard ratio, 8.38 [4.46-15.74], P < .0001), patients with incomplete revascularization (33.4% vs 86.1%; hazard ratio, 7.86 [3.97-15.55], P < .0001), and patients with left ventricular end-systolic diameter 45 mm or greater (65.9% vs 88.1%; hazard ratio, 5.29 [2.81-9.96], P < .0001). Age more than 65 years, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, and preoperative renal dysfunction did not significantly affect 12- or 20-year survival. On multivariate analysis, residual mitral regurgitation and incomplete revascularization independently predicted 12-year mortality, whereas at 20 years, residual mitral regurgitation, incomplete revascularization, and left ventricular end-systolic diameter 45 mm or greater were independent predictors.
Conclusions:
This 2-decade experience shows that mitral valve repair with restrictive annuloplasty combined with coronary artery bypass grafting yields favorable long-term survival in moderate or moderate-to-severe chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation, particularly when residual mitral regurgitation is avoided, revascularization is complete, and preoperative left ventricular end-systolic diameter is less than 45 mm.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

