Epineural Scarring Visualization and Noninvasive Quantification of a Severe Posttraumatic Complication: An
Merle Brunnée1, Martin Aman, Maximilian Mayrhofer-Schmid
1From the Department of Neuroradiology, Neurological University Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B., M.F., K.K.-J., M.O.B., S.H., M.B., D.S.); and Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany (M.A., M.M.-S., S.C.D., T.K., U.K., L.H., A.H.B.).
Aim:
Peripheral nerve scarring is a severe yet common complication following nerve injury or surgery that can lead to impaired nerve function, including chronic pain and sensory or motor deficits. In this study, we aimed to establish high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) to accurately visualize and monitor de novo-formed epineural fibrotic adhesions (EFAs) of the sciatic nerve in a rat nerve injury model.
Methods:
Employing an established model to induce overshooting EFA, the study included 3 experimental groups of animals (n = 6 each): a positive control group (PC), an intervention group (IG), and a sham group. All groups underwent surgical nerve exposure: both PC and IG received an application of 10 μL 2.5% glutaraldehyde to induce EFA, but only IG received an additional preventive wrapping of the nerve with a collagen-containing matrix. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 6, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively using a standardized protocol including T2w and T1w without and with contrast media. Motor function and nerve regeneration was assessed using the visual static sciatic index. Histological specimens were obtained 12 weeks postoperatively and correlated with imaging.
Results:
On high-resolution MRN, prominently contrast-enhancing epineural sleeves were present in vivo, which corresponded to histologically confirmed EFA (ratio of EFA to nerve area MRN 1.512 ± 0.106 vs histological ratio 1.459 ± 0.208, nonsignificant). As expected, average EFA in IG (0.310 ± 0.118 mm 2 ) was smaller than in PC (0.909 ± 0.212 mm 2 , P < 0.01). Also, the average EFA in sham (0.386 ± 0.030 mm 2 ) was less pronounced than in PC ( P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the average EFA between IG und sham. The EFA correlated with the functional outcome, which was measured by visual static sciatic index (correlation coefficient -0.59, P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
The results of the present study for the first time confirm the clinical observation that epineural thickening on contrast-enhanced T1w imaging following manipulation to a nerve indeed corresponds to overshooting epineural scarring, which may be linked to impaired nerve function. This can be followed noninvasively in vivo over time providing an important basis for clinical decision-making in cases where further invasive therapies may be necessary.
More Related Videos
08:23A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
07:02An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System
Published on: January 12, 2011
