Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

5.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.6K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.5K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

8.9K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
8.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

121
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
121
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

1.6K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
1.6K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Should We Keep or Remove Outliers?

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same author

Check for Outliers.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same author

Sub-lethal effects of natural cyanobacterial blooms on fish: Enzymatic activity and swimming performance in Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Harmful algae·2025
Same author

Questionable Research Practices: HARKing.

The Journal of nursing education·2025
Same author

Questionable Research Practices: Cherry Picking.

The Journal of nursing education·2025
Same author

Questionable Research Practices: <i>p</i>-Hacking.

The Journal of nursing education·2025
Same journal

Truth.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

AI Utilization and Clinical Judgment: Predictors of Caring Behavior Among Nursing Students.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Mental Health Nursing Simulation to Develop the Therapeutic Use of Self.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Cultivating Clinical Judgment Through Wound Building: A Teaching Innovation.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Pathophysiology as a Predictor of Success in a Prelicensure Undergraduate Nursing Program.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.1K

Adopting Optimal Statistical Practices: Reviewers.

John M Taylor

    The Journal of Nursing Education
    |November 7, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Peer reviewers can improve research quality by enhancing their statistical knowledge and utilizing supportive tools. Increased reviewer engagement with statistical expertise is encouraged for better scientific integrity.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
    08:36

    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

    Published on: April 19, 2024

    441
    Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice
    06:11

    Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice

    Published on: October 19, 2019

    19.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

    Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
    06:26

    Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

    Published on: November 27, 2019

    70.1K
    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
    08:36

    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

    Published on: April 19, 2024

    441
    Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice
    06:11

    Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice

    Published on: October 19, 2019

    19.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Methodology
    • Scientific Review
    • Statistical Practices

    Background:

    • Peer review is crucial for maintaining scientific integrity.
    • Statistical methodology is fundamental to research validity.
    • Enhancing reviewer statistical expertise can elevate research quality.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline strategies for peer reviewers to foster optimal statistical practices.
    • To encourage reviewers to improve their statistical acumen and utilize review tools.
    • To promote the active participation of statistically expert reviewers.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion of reviewer responsibilities in statistical assessment.
    • Recommendations for reviewer training in statistics.
    • Highlighting the utility of statistical review tools.

    Main Results:

    • Peer reviewers can significantly impact research quality through statistical oversight.
    • Enhanced statistical expertise among reviewers leads to more rigorous scientific evaluations.
    • Active participation of expert reviewers strengthens the peer-review process.

    Conclusions:

    • Peer reviewers play a vital role in upholding statistical rigor in research.
    • Continuous learning and tool utilization by reviewers are essential for scientific advancement.
    • Encouraging expert reviewers enhances the overall quality and reliability of published research.