Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

08:25
Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
Published on: May 7, 2019
8.9K
Automatic Apple Detection and Counting with AD-YOLO and MR-SORT.
Xueliang Yang1, Yapeng Gao1, Mengyu Yin1
1College of Computer Science and Technology (College of Data Science), Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong 030600, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 9, 2024
Summary
Accurate fruit counting in orchards is improved with a new video tracking method, MR-SORT. This method enhances apple detection and reduces tracking errors for better yield estimation.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural technology
- Computer vision
- Machine learning
Background:
- Accurate fruit counting is crucial for agricultural production management, impacting yield estimation and decision-making.
- Existing tracking-by-detection algorithms struggle with occlusion and lighting variations in orchards, hindering automatic and precise apple counting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an advanced video-based multiple-object tracking method for accurate fruit counting in complex agricultural environments.
- To enhance the performance of object detection and tracking algorithms for improved orchard yield estimation.
Main Methods:
- Proposed AD-YOLO model integrating Omni-dimensional Dynamic Convolution (ODConv), Global Attention Mechanism (GAM), and Soft Spatial Pyramid Pooling Layer (SSPPL) for improved detection.
- Developed an enhanced BoT-SORT algorithm by incorporating a verification mechanism, SURF feature descriptors, and Vector of Local Aggregate Descriptors (VLAD) for robust tracking.
- Utilized video-based multiple-object tracking for real-time fruit counting in orchard settings.
Main Results:
- The AD-YOLO model achieved a 3.1% higher mAP (96.4%) compared to the standard YOLOv8.
- The improved tracking algorithm reduced ID switches by 35.6% (297 fewer).
- Achieved 85.6% multiple-object tracking accuracy, an average counting error of 0.07, and an R² of 0.98.
Conclusions:
- The MR-SORT method significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of automatic fruit counting in orchards.
- The enhanced detection and tracking capabilities offer a robust solution for agricultural yield estimation and management.
- The proposed approach demonstrates potential for accurate counting of various fruit types beyond apples.
Related Concept Videos
Force Classification
1.1K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.1K
Aggregates Classification
305
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
305
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
5.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
5.9K

