Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
Published on: February 16, 2024
Representing Animals: Moral and Epistemic Limits for Protection Against Cruelty
Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues1, Demin Duan2
1Department of Philosophy, Yuelu Academy, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
Abstract:
Some philosophers argue that animals should be included in the democratic system, with people acting as their representatives in voting on issues that concern them. This article contends that, while animals' rights are fundamentally important, granting people rights to represent animals in democratic processes may lead to the opposite of what we want. Or worse, it may put animals' interests and rights at significant risk. If animals' rights are basic and straightforward, as proponents of this proposal assume, then deliberation is either redundant or dangerous in safeguarding the interests of animals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Limits to Natural Selection
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Altruism
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...

