Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
A qualitative exploration of nursing master's research supervision in a private higher education institution
Bibi Hajira Irshad Ali1, Gideon Victor2, Khauhelo Succes Mahlatsi3
1Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Shifa College of Nursing Islamabad, Pakistan; Iqra University, Department of Nursing, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan.
Background:
Completing a Master's thesis is crucial for earning a master's degree and showcasing students' academic and professional skills. However, the process is often challenging owing to its solitary nature and the complexity of its supervisory relationships.
Purpose:
This study aimed to explore the experience of Nursing Master's Research Supervision and its impact on their thesis journey.
Design:
Exploratory descriptive qualitative research design.
Setting And Participants:
The study was conducted at a private nursing institute in Islamabad, Pakistan, from January 2022 to May 2022. The study included 12 students enrolled in the Masters of Science in Nursing program.
Methods:
Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted online, using a semi-structured guide. Students were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were analysed using manual content analysis through a collaborative approach. Rigor was ensured using Lincoln and Guba's trustworthiness criteria. SRQR reporting guidelines were used.
Results:
The study explored graduate students' thesis supervision experiences and discovered six influential categories: "Expectations from Supervisor", encompassing preceding knowledge and teaching perceptions; "Supervisor Accessibility", involving physical access and cooperation; "Adverse Supervision Experience", detailing challenging interactions; "Supervision Meeting Management", addressing problem-solving and scheduling; "Assistance and Support", covering collaboration, software, and resources; and "Suggestions", offering guidance on thesis write-up and research committee roles.
Conclusion:
The study elucidated students' expectations about supervisor expertise, access difficulties, negative experiences, and the need for clear guidelines. Improved communication, defined roles, and increased support for thesis writing and assessment are crucial for satisfactory supervision. Further investigation of supervisors' viewpoints is advised.
More Related Videos
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
00:08A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
Related Concept Videos
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Nursing Evaluation