Optimizing Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillator in a Multicenter
Hiroyuki Sato1, Takashi Noda1,2, Tomohiro Ito1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine.
Insights
The MADIT-ICD benefit score effectively identifies Japanese patients suitable for cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator. This score aids in predicting both ventricular arrhythmias and non-arrhythmic mortality in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- The MADIT-ICD benefit score (MBS) is established for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) selection.
- Optimal patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains an area of investigation.
- The applicability of the MBS in Japanese CRT patient populations requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the utility of the MADIT-ICD benefit score (MBS) in identifying suitable candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) in a Japanese population.
- To evaluate the MBS's ability to predict ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and non-arrhythmic mortality (AM) in CRT patients.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter study involving 400 primary prevention CRT patients in Japan.
- Patients were stratified into lowest, intermediate, and highest benefit groups based on the MBS.
- Cumulative incidence of VT/VF and AM was assessed over a median follow-up of 34 months.
- Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of VT/VF and AM.
Main Results:
- The MBS demonstrated significant associations with both VT/VF events and non-arrhythmic mortality.
- VT/VF occurred significantly more often in intermediate and highest benefit groups compared to the lowest.
- Non-arrhythmic death was also significantly higher in the intermediate and lowest benefit groups.
- Predictors for VT/VF included VT/VF score ≥7 and presence of left bundle branch block.
- Predictors for non-arrhythmic death included Non-AM score ≥3, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, and eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m².
Conclusions:
- The MADIT-ICD benefit score is a valuable tool for selecting appropriate candidates for CRT-D in Japanese patients.
- The MBS aids in stratifying risk for both life-threatening arrhythmias and non-arrhythmic mortality.
Background:
Although the MADIT-ICD benefit score (MBS) helps select suitable implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates, optimal indicators for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain uncertain. Evaluating the applicability of the MBS in Japanese CRT patients is imperative.
Methods And Results:
This multicenter study assessed the cumulative incidence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and non-arrhythmic mortality (AM) in CRT patients grouped according to potential benefit (lowest, highest, and intermediate). Among 400 primary prevention patients (mean age 65 years, 76% male), VT/VF occurred in 4 (7%), 68 (24%), and 14 (23%) patients in the lowest-, intermediate-, and highest-benefit groups, respectively (P=0.027), over a median follow-up of 34 months. Non-arrhythmic death was observed in 15 (25%), 91 (33%), and 9 (15%) patients in the lowest-, intermediate-, and highest-benefit groups, respectively (P=0.025). Multivariate analysis identified VT/VF score ≥7 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-4.19; P=0.027) as a significant VT/VF predictor. The presence of left bundle branch block (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.92; P=0.025) was associated with a reduced risk of VT/VF events. Non-AM score ≥3 (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.01-2.88; P=0.047), systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.25-2.70; P=0.002), and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2(HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.23-3.20; P=0.005) were significant predictors of non-arrhythmic death.
Conclusions:
The MBS can identify suitable candidates for CRT-D among Japanese individuals.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care


