MULTIFIDELITY ESTIMATORS FOR CORONARY CIRCULATION MODELS UNDER CLINICALLY INFORMED DATA UNCERTAINTY
Jongmin Seo1, Casey Fleeter2, Andrew M Kahn3
1Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Bioengineering and ICME, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Quantifying uncertainty in coronary artery disease models is crucial for accurate diagnosis. This study uses multifidelity Monte Carlo methods to improve the reliability of patient-specific blood flow simulations, reducing computational cost and enhancing accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Computational fluid dynamics
- Biomedical engineering
- Cardiovascular research
Background:
- Numerical models are vital for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) and planning treatments.
- Current deterministic models lack quantitative assessment of simulation output variability due to input uncertainties.
- Accurate patient-specific models require precise parameters like aortic pressure waveform and intramyocardial pressure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the impact of input parameter uncertainty on clinically relevant outputs in coronary circulation models.
- To develop and validate a computational framework for uncertainty quantification in patient-specific coronary models.
- To reduce the computational cost of uncertainty propagation in complex hemodynamics simulations.
Main Methods:
- Developed a deformable model of the left coronary artery using an arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian framework for fluid-structure interaction.
- Estimated random input uncertainty from repeated intracoronary catheterization measurements and literature data.
- Employed multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators, including 0D lumped parameter models, to reduce computational cost and improve variance estimation.
Main Results:
- Multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators significantly reduced variance and improved accuracy compared to traditional Monte Carlo methods.
- Combining 3D hemodynamics simulations with 0D lumped parameter network models yielded the most accurate results.
- The computational overhead for the combined approach was negligible (less than 1%).
Conclusions:
- Uncertainty quantification is essential for reliable patient-specific coronary circulation modeling in clinical practice.
- Multifidelity Monte Carlo methods offer an efficient and accurate approach for uncertainty propagation in complex cardiovascular simulations.
- The integration of low-fidelity models with high-fidelity simulations provides a powerful tool for advancing noninvasive diagnosis and treatment planning in CAD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals


