Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Effects of Exposure of Formaldehyde to a Rat Model of Atopic Dermatitis Induced by Neonatal Capsaicin Treatment
Published on: September 27, 2017
Rocatinlimab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a
Melinda Gooderham1, Emma Guttman-Yassky2, Ken Igawa3
1SKiN Centre for Dermatology, Queen's University and Probity Medical Research, 775 Monaghan Road, Peterborough, ON, Canada. mgooderham@centrefordermatology.com.
Introduction:
In adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), rocatinlimab demonstrated significant and progressive improvement in clinical measures of disease severity compared with placebo. This post hoc analysis of a phase 2b study was undertaken to understand the disease burden and to assess the impact of rocatinlimab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Methods:
This analysis used baseline data from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of adults with moderate-to-severe AD, who completed a Worst Pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS), Sleep Disturbance NRS, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A mixed model for repeated measures was used to estimate changes in PRO scores from baseline; scores were also compared with clinically meaningful change benchmarks.
Results:
The analysis included 267 subjects, mean (SD) age 37.9 (14.7) years, 40.8% female; 55.1% grade 3 and 44.9% grade 4 Investigator Global Assessment for AD. Mean (SD) scores were: Worst Pruritus NRS 7.5 (1.9), Sleep Disturbance NRS 5.5 (2.9), DLQI total score 12.6 (7.1). Worst Pruritus and Sleep NRS scores had low positive correlations with SCORing AD (SCORAD) score (r = 0.44, r = 0.45 respectively) and negligible correlations with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and area affected (r < 0.30). DLQI score varied by sex, study country, race, age, longer disease duration, disease severity (EASI and SCORAD), presence of asthma, and Worst Pruritus NRS, Sleep disturbance NRS, and DLQI scores. Rocatinlimab showed benefit on all three PROs, with significant improvements from baseline at the end of the double-blind period (week 18) and active treatment extension (week 36). Benefits were maintained over 20 weeks' post-treatment follow-up. The benefit of rocatinlimab treatment on PROs is rapid and maintained for at least 20 weeks following treatment completion.
Conclusion:
This analysis demonstrates the importance of characterizing the burden of moderate-to-severe AD from the patient's perspective, alongside clinical disease measures, to develop a fuller picture of treatment benefit.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03703102.
More Related Videos
09:32Resolving Water, Proteins, and Lipids from In Vivo Confocal Raman Spectra of Stratum Corneum through a Chemometric Approach
Published on: September 26, 2019
03:10Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Compound Acne Rodent Model Using C. acnes and Oleic Acid
Published on: November 1, 2024