Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025
Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Different Wire Surface Treatments on Adhesion Efficacy of Orthodontic Fixed Retainer: An In Vitro Study
Sarah M Naji1, Mohammad H Mohammad2, Enas T Enan3
1Department of Orthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, Phone: +00201104572303, e-mail: sarahmnaji@gmail.com, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2845-5285.
Aim:
This study assesses the impact of surface treatment with sandblasting and Z-primer on the adhesion efficacy of fixed lingual retainers.
Materials And Methods:
Dead soft stainless steel wire 0.016 × 0.022-inch (n = 120) was treated by different techniques and classified into four groups equally (n = 30) according to surface treatment. Group I wire without treatment, group II wire treated with sandblasting, group III wire treated with Z-primer alone, and group IV wire treated with sandblasting with Z-primer. The stainless steel wire (n = 40) was bonded to 80 extracted premolars in pairs mounted in acrylic. Other stainless steel wires (n = 80) are embedded into acrylic blocks. All groups were divided into two subgroups according to thermocycling teeth samples were assessed by shear bond strength (SBS) A stereomicroscope was used to calculate the adhesive remnant index (ARI), while the acrylic block was by pull-out test. Finally, data were analyzed by IBM-SPSS (V 27, 2020). Mann-Whitney U-test; Kruskal-Wallis H-test and, two-way ANOVA were utilized to assess for SBS and pull-out.
Results:
Kruskal-Wallis H-test showed a non-significant difference in ARI between all groups, while in two-way mixed ANOVA demonstrated a significant difference in SBS between group III (sandblasting/Z-primer) vs group I and group IV Z-primer (p = 0.028) and control (p = 0.016), and a significant difference between group II sandblasting vs both group I and group IV Z-primer (p = 0.024) and control (p = 0.014). The two-way mixed ANOVA tests showed a significant difference in pull-out between sandblasting/Z-primer vs Z-primer (p = 0.012).
Conclusion:
Using of mixed surface treatment for fixed retainer as sandblasting with Z-primer is considered as the best method to increase adhesion efficacy between wire and composite and improve the quality of orthodontics fixation when compared with single treatment (sandblasting alone or Z prime). On the other hand, the sue of sandblasting alone for fixed retainer surface treatment is better than Z-primer alone but both treatments are better than fixed retainer without treatment.
Clinical Application:
Developed and examined new and traditional techniques used to treat the surface of wire used as a retainer after orthodontics treatment to improve patients' treatment and life quality and decrease the chance of relapse. How to cite this article: Naji SM, Mohammad MH, Enan ET, et al. Different Wire Surface Treatments on Adhesion Efficacy of Orthodontic Fixed Retainer: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(7):677-683.
