Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review
Lily F Roberts1, Libby G Lord2, Caroline A Crowther2
1Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, lily.roberts@auckland.ac.nz.
Insights
Intravenous (IV) dextrose infusion for neonatal hypoglycemia shows uncertain benefits and risks. While it may reduce repeated hypoglycemia, it might increase hyperglycemia risk. More research is crucial for clarity.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Effectiveness Research
Background:
- Neonatal hypoglycemia often requires intravenous (IV) dextrose if other methods fail, but its efficacy is uncertain.
- This review assesses the risks and benefits of IV dextrose for treating hypoglycemia in newborns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of intravenous dextrose for neonatal hypoglycemia.
Main Methods:
- Searched four databases and three registries up to October 5, 2023, including RCTs and observational studies.
- Assessed risk of bias using established tools and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
- Meta-analysis was not performed due to insufficient data.
Main Results:
- Six studies (2 RCTs, 4 cohort) involving 711 infants were analyzed.
- IV dextrose showed no association with neurodevelopmental impairment (very low certainty evidence).
- It may reduce recurrent hypoglycemia (low certainty evidence) but could increase hyperglycemia risk.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence on the benefits and risks of IV dextrose for neonatal hypoglycemia is limited.
- Further research is necessary to establish clear guidelines for its use.
Introduction:
Hypoglycaemic neonates are usually admitted to neonatal intensive care for intravenous (IV) dextrose infusion if increased feeding and dextrose gel fail to restore normoglycaemia. However, the effectiveness of this intervention is uncertain. This review aimed to assess the evidence for the risks and benefits of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Methods:
Four databases and three clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 5, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort studies, and before and after studies were considered for inclusion without language or publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool or Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis was planned but not carried out due to insufficient data.
Results:
Across 6 studies (two RCTs and four cohort), 711 participants were included. Evidence from one cohort study suggests IV dextrose treatment may not be associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at ≥18 months of age (no effect numbers, p > 0.2; very low certainty evidence; 60 infants). Evidence from one RCT suggests IV dextrose treatment may reduce the likelihood of repeated hypoglycaemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.20, 2.18], p = 0.5; low certainty evidence; 80 infants) compared to treatment with oral sucrose bolus. However, the risk of a hyperglycaemic episode may be increased (RR: 2.33 [95% CI: 0.65, 8.39], p = 0.19; 80 infants).
Conclusion:
More evidence is needed to clarify the benefits and risks of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Introduction:
Hypoglycaemic neonates are usually admitted to neonatal intensive care for intravenous (IV) dextrose infusion if increased feeding and dextrose gel fail to restore normoglycaemia. However, the effectiveness of this intervention is uncertain. This review aimed to assess the evidence for the risks and benefits of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Methods:
Four databases and three clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 5, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort studies, and before and after studies were considered for inclusion without language or publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool or Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis was planned but not carried out due to insufficient data.
Results:
Across 6 studies (two RCTs and four cohort), 711 participants were included. Evidence from one cohort study suggests IV dextrose treatment may not be associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at ≥18 months of age (no effect numbers, p > 0.2; very low certainty evidence; 60 infants). Evidence from one RCT suggests IV dextrose treatment may reduce the likelihood of repeated hypoglycaemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.20, 2.18], p = 0.5; low certainty evidence; 80 infants) compared to treatment with oral sucrose bolus. However, the risk of a hyperglycaemic episode may be increased (RR: 2.33 [95% CI: 0.65, 8.39], p = 0.19; 80 infants).
Conclusion:
More evidence is needed to clarify the benefits and risks of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Related Concept Videos
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Glucose Transporters
Facilitated diffusion-glucose transporters (GLUTs) are encoded by the solute-linked carrier (SLC) family 2, subfamily A gene family, or SLC2A. The 14 GLUT protein members are distributed into three classes:

