Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

1.1K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.1K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.5K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.5K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Compensatory Effects of Joint Bracing From a Kinetic Chain Perspective: Lower Limb Movement Coordination Analysis During Badminton Lunge Movements.

European journal of sport science·2026
Same author

Immediate effects of ankle brace design on mediolateral postural control and perceived support in young adults with functional ankle instability.

Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine·2026
Same author

Quantitative study on the discriminative value of fingerprint minutiae.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same author

A forensic evaluation method of stable diffusion-generated images using feature-based likelihood ratio by deep learning features.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same author

Arch-pad design and insole material jointly influence regional plantar loading and perceived comfort during walking in women's occupational footwear.

Ergonomics·2026
Same author

A score based likelihood ratio framework for deepfake image identification in forensic science.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints
09:47

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

14.8K

Score-based likelihood ratios for barefootprint evidence using deep learning features.

Yi Yang BEng1, Yunqi Tang1, Junjian Cui MEng2

  • 1School of Criminal Investigation, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing, China.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|November 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces deep learning for barefootprint analysis, enhancing forensic evidence evaluation. The proposed method achieves high accuracy in matching barefootprints, supporting objective legal identification.

Keywords:
barefootprint evidencecomparison scoresdeep learningdistance measuresfeature extractionscore‐based likelihood ratios

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

471
A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints
09:47

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

14.8K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

471
A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Computer Science
  • Biometrics

Background:

  • Courts require higher scientific standards for forensic evidence evaluation.
  • Traditional barefootprint identification methods face challenges in objective, quantitative assessment.
  • Limited research exists on deep learning for barefootprint features in legal evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose score-based likelihood ratios for barefootprint evidence using deep learning features.
  • To develop an automatic barefootprint feature extraction and matching algorithm.
  • To enhance the quantitative evaluation of barefootprint evidence in legal settings.

Main Methods:

  • Construction of the largest barefootprint dataset (BFD) with 54,118 images from 3000 individuals.
  • Development of an automatic deep learning-based feature extraction and matching algorithm.
  • Application of Cosine, Euclidean, and Manhattan distances for comparing barefootprint features across different dimensions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed algorithm achieved 98.4% retrieval accuracy on the BFD dataset.
  • A barefootprint validation AUC of 0.989 was obtained.
  • The method demonstrated practical applicability through simulated crime scene samples.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning features combined with score-based likelihood ratios offer a robust approach for barefootprint evidence evaluation.
  • The developed algorithm significantly improves the accuracy and objectivity of barefootprint matching.
  • This research provides strong support for the quantitative assessment of barefootprint evidence in court.