Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
Published on: March 1, 2017
Shortcuts to insincerity: Texting abbreviations seem insincere and not worth answering
David Fang1, Yiran Eileen Zhang1, Sam J Maglio2
1Department of Marketing, Stanford University.
Abstract:
As social interactions increasingly move to digital platforms, communicators confront new factors that enhance or diminish virtual interactions. Texting abbreviations, for instance, are now pervasive in digital communication-but do they enhance or diminish interactions? The present study examines the influence of texting abbreviation usage on interpersonal perceptions. We explore how texting abbreviations affect perceived sender sincerity and the subsequent likelihood that recipients respond. Eight preregistered studies (N = 5,306) using mixed methods (e.g., surveys, field and lab experiments, and archival analysis of Tinder conversations) find that abbreviations make senders seem less sincere and recipients less likely to write back. These negative effects arise because abbreviations signal a lower level of effort from the sender. Communicator familiarity and text exchange length do not attenuate these effects, providing evidence for a robust phenomenon. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
Schemas
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social Proof
Framing Effects
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

