Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

525
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
525
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

3.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
3.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

653
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
653
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

484
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
484
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.4K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.4K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncertainty Quantification in Molecular Machine Learning for Property Predictions under Data Shifts.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Practically Significant Method Comparison Protocols for Machine Learning in Small Molecule Drug Discovery.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Bone Selective Remodeling of Xeno-Hybrid Grafts: A Case Series.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Scaffold Hopping with Generative Reinforcement Learning.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

RADAR-AD: assessment of multiple remote monitoring technologies for early detection of Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2025
Same author

DeepCt: Predicting Pharmacokinetic Concentration-Time Curves and Compartmental Models from Chemical Structure Using Deep Learning.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2024
Same journal

PFASGroups: An Open-Source Framework for Automated Identification, Structural Classification, and Prioritization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

DeepKbhb: Context-Aware Prediction of Human Lysine β-Hydroxybutyrylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

HyperDC: A Non-Uniform Hypergraph Framework for Dual- and Higher-Order Drug Combination Recommendation Across Diverse Complex Diseases.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Correction to "AstraMEV (AI-Guided Structural Assembly of Multi-Epitope Vaccines) Against Infectious Bronchitis Virus".

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

MolPy: A Large Language Model-Friendly Toolkit for Reactive Topology Editing in Polymer Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Molecular Mechanisms of KIT Receptor Dimerization and Oncogenic Activation Revealed by Multiscale Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

UNIQUE: A Framework for Uncertainty Quantification Benchmarking.

Jessica Lanini1, Minh Tam Davide Huynh1, Gaetano Scebba1

  • 1Novartis Biomedical Research, Novartis Campus, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|November 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in machine learning (ML) is crucial for reliable predictions in science. The UNIQUE framework standardizes UQ benchmarking to improve model evaluation and reliability in new applications.

More Related Videos

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

14.4K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

14.4K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Data science
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) models are integral to decision-making in fields like drug discovery.
  • Evaluating ML model robustness and predictive power in real-world scenarios is challenging.
  • Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is vital for assessing ML model reliability, but a universal strategy is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the UNIQUE (UNcertaInty QUantification bEnchmarking) framework for comparing UQ strategies in ML.
  • To provide a standardized approach for evaluating UQ methodologies across diverse applications.
  • To facilitate the development and assessment of new UQ methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the UNIQUE Python library for unifying UQ metric benchmarking.
  • Implementation of standard and nonstandard UQ metrics, integrating dataset and model information.
  • Evaluation of UQ metrics across various application scenarios, including confidence-based filtering and acquisition functions.

Main Results:

  • The UNIQUE framework enables comprehensive benchmarking of multiple UQ strategies.
  • It allows for the calculation of novel UQ metrics tailored to specific applications.
  • The library facilitates a consistent and thorough evaluation of UQ performance.

Conclusions:

  • The UNIQUE framework standardizes UQ investigations in ML-based predictions.
  • It aids in selecting appropriate UQ metrics for different tasks and datasets.
  • This tool will advance the reliability and applicability of ML models in scientific research.