Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Mixed Methods Studies Using Secondary Analysis in Nursing and Midwifery: A Methodological Review
Sergi Fàbregues1, Ahtisham Younas2, Shahzad Inayat3
1Department of Psychology and Education, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Aim:
To identify mixed methods studies in nursing and midwifery using secondary analysis and to examine their methodological characteristics.
Design:
Methodological review.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted to identify empirical mixed methods studies in nursing and midwifery that used secondary analysis. A data extraction sheet was developed based on previous methodological reviews of secondary analysis and mixed methods.
Data Sources:
SCOPUS, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched from inception to March 10, 2023. Supplementary searches were conducted in two methodological journals and six nursing journals.
Results:
A total of 26 mixed methods studies published between 2000 and 2022 were included in the review. Of these, only 13 studies explicitly mentioned the type of mixed methods design used. Twenty studies showed evidence of integration of the quantitative and qualitative components. Most of these studies integrated the components at the interpretation stage, whereas fewer integrated the components during data collection. None of the studies mentioned the rationale for using secondary analysis in the context of a mixed methods study.
Conclusion:
The included studies demonstrated fairly good reporting of mixed methods features, although they generally lacked a rationale for the use of secondary data.
Implications For The Profession And/Or Patient Care:
Adequate reporting of mixed methods studies using secondary analysis is essential in order to allow readers to assess whether secondary analysis was appropriately incorporated into a mixed methods study and whether the potential of secondary analysis was fully exploited.
Impact:
This review provides a set of recommendations to transparently report information regarding the research process and results obtained in mixed methods studies using secondary analysis.
Reporting Method:
Items relevant to methodological reviews included in the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) were considered for reporting the review.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Data Collection II
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Nursing Evaluation
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...