Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Arthur Peyrottes1, Charles Dariane2, Michael Baboudjian3
1Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, Paris, France; Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris-Cité University, Paris, France.
Background And Objective:
The role of anatomical factors in predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the impact of various anatomical factors on the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing RP for localized prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted through January 2024 using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled for a meta-analysis, with outcomes including operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, overall complications, and positive surgical margins (PSMs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q test, and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the influence of surgical approach.
Key Findings And Limitations:
A total of 91 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among the anatomical factors, prostate volume (PV), prostate weight, and median lobe (ML) were suitable for the meta-analysis. Larger prostates were associated with increased operative time, blood loss, and complication rates, but with fewer PSMs (all p < 0.05). ML presence was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Heterogeneity was high across studies (Cochrane Q tests <0.05), reflecting inconsistent definitions and methods. In subgroup analyses, the open approach was associated with a longer operative time than robotic surgery for large prostates (p = 0.03) and a lower PSM rate (p < 0.001).
Conclusions And Clinical Implications:
Anatomical factors, particularly PV, play a significant role in RP outcomes. Larger prostates are associated with higher complication rates but fewer PSMs. Further research with standardized outcome measures is necessary to clarify these relationships and guide clinical decision-making.
Patient Summary:
In this study, we examined how a patient's individual anatomy might affect the results of prostate surgery for cancer. We found that larger prostates tend to lead to longer surgeries and increased blood loss, but these also have a lower risk of leaving cancer cells behind. These findings could help doctors in better planning surgeries and improving patient outcomes.
