Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.4K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.4K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

830
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
830
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

652
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
652
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

8.3K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.3K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

28
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
28

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanistic simulation identifies predictive dose-dependent biomarkers of propofol anesthesia.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Mechanistic corticostriatal circuit model predicts learning-dependent fMRI dynamics and individual reward bias in humans.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Brain age prediction in generalized anxiety disorder using a convolutional neural network.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Identifying strategies to improve life participation in children with chronic kidney disease: report from multinational SONG workshops.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2026
Same author

Quantifying individual variability in neural control circuit regulation using single-subject fMRI.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Single-cell parameter inference reveals kinetic heterogeneity in synthetic mammalian gene expression.

Biophysical journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy
08:25

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Published on: April 27, 2021

3.6K

Parameter estimation from an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with measurement noise.

Simon Carter1, Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi2, Helmut H Strey3

  • 1Applied Mathematics and Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, <a href="https://ror.org/05qghxh33">Stony Brook University</a>, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5281, USA.

Physical Review. E
|November 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study develops faster algorithms for separating thermal and multiplicative noise in Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. It shows how to accurately estimate parameters even when multiplicative noise dominates, improving signal separation and data analysis.

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy
08:25

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Published on: April 27, 2021

3.6K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Physics
  • Data Science
  • Stochastic Processes

Background:

  • Parameter fitting in Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes is challenged by multiplicative and thermal noise.
  • Accurate signal separation and parameter estimation are crucial for data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of multiplicative and thermal noise on parameter fitting.
  • To develop algorithms for distinguishing between noise types and improving parameter estimation accuracy.
  • To resolve signal obfuscation caused by combined noise effects.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel algorithm for thermal noise separation, achieving comparable performance to Hamilton Monte Carlo (HMC) but with increased speed.
  • Analyzed the limitations of HMC in isolating thermal and multiplicative noise.
  • Investigated conditions for accurate noise discrimination using sampling rate and noise amplitude ratios.

Main Results:

  • The proposed algorithm offers a significant speed improvement over HMC for thermal noise separation.
  • HMC is insufficient for distinguishing between thermal and multiplicative noise.
  • Accurate noise separation is achievable with knowledge of the noise ratio, sufficient sampling rates, or when multiplicative noise is less dominant than thermal noise.

Conclusions:

  • Novel algorithms enhance the speed and accuracy of parameter estimation in noisy systems.
  • A counterintuitive method of adding white noise can enable parameter estimation when multiplicative noise is dominant.
  • The findings improve the precision of signal separation and data analysis in stochastic processes.