Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025
Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment
Published on: March 24, 2020
The effect of inconsistent guidelines on variability in pediatric vision screening referral outcomes
Samantha J Sechrist1, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes2
1School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Insights
Conflicting pediatric vision screening guidelines create provider uncertainty. Discrepancies in referral criteria for older children led to a 2.7-fold difference in failure rates and an 18% difference in referrals.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric ophthalmology
- Primary care pediatrics
- Public health
Background:
- Yearly vision screenings are crucial for detecting childhood ocular disorders in primary care.
- Existing pediatric vision screening guidelines show discrepancies for children aged 5-6 years.
- These inconsistencies can impact referral accuracy and patient care.
Abstract:
Yearly vision screenings, often performed in a primary care setting, are an important part of child health for detection of ocular disorders, but there are discrepancies in referral guidelines. Whereas guidelines provide consistent failure and referral criteria for 3- and 4-year-olds, criteria for older children disagree. To investigate the effect of having discordant guidelines, we retrospectively applied each guideline threshold to a cohort of 5- to 6-year-olds who underwent visual acuity screening during a well-child encounter and compared the results to the real-life referral rates. We found a 2.7-fold difference in the proportion of 5- to 6-year-olds children failing a vision screening and a difference in referral rate of 18%. Our results demonstrate that the existence of even mildly conflicting pediatric vision screening guidelines can lead to uncertainty among primary care providers who perform vision screening in children. We hope that this study will shed light on the problem and stimulate efforts to harmonize referral criteria.
