Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
Published on: November 15, 2013
Tight Lower Bounds for Directed Cut Sparsification and Distributed Min-Cut
Yu Cheng1, Max Li2, Honghao Lin2
1Brown University.
Abstract:
In this paper, we consider two fundamental cut approximation problems on large graphs. We prove new lower bounds for both problems that are optimal up to logarithmic factors. The first problem is to approximate cuts in balanced directed graphs. In this problem, the goal is to build a data structure that -approximates cut values in graphs with vertices. For arbitrary directed graphs, such a data structure requires bits even for constant . To circumvent this, recent works study -balanced graphs, meaning that for every directed cut, the total weight of edges in one direction is at most times that in the other direction. We consider two models: the for-each model, where the goal is to approximate each cut with constant probability, and the for-all model, where all cuts must be preserved simultaneously. We improve the previous lower bound to in the for-each model, and we improve the previous lower bound to in the for-all model. This resolves the main open questions of (Cen et al., ICALP, 2021). The second problem is to approximate the global minimum cut in a local query model, where we can only access the graph via degree, edge, and adjacency queries. We improve the previous query complexity lower bound to for this problem, where m is the number of edges, is the size of the minimum cut, and we seek a -approximation. In addition, we show that existing upper bounds with slight modifications match our lower bound up to logarithmic factors.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Restriction Enzymes
The host bacteria protect their own genomic DNA from these enzymes by methylating these sites. Some...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes

