Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Effect of aniseikonia on binocular function.

O Katsumi, T Tanino, T Hirose

    Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
    |April 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    The human visual system can compensate for up to 3.0% aniseikonia (retinal image size difference). Beyond this, binocular inhibition occurs, impacting visual processing. This study used visual evoked response (VER) to measure this effect.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Neurovisual abnormalities preceding the retinopathy in patients with long-term type 1 diabetes mellitus.

    Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2001
    Same author

    Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity function using contrast sweep visual evoked responses.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·1998
    Same author

    Visual Ability Score -- a new method to analyze ability in visually impaired children.

    Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica·1998
    Same author

    Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.

    Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·1998
    Same author

    Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER.

    Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·1997
    Same author

    Five years' experience with the Grating disc. A simplified method of evaluating vision in young children.

    Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica·1997
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Neuroscience
    • Visual Science

    Background:

    • Aniseikonia, a condition where perceived retinal image sizes differ between eyes, can affect binocular vision.
    • Understanding the limits of binocular compensation for aniseikonia is crucial for visual health assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To objectively evaluate the impact of induced aniseikonia on binocular summation using pattern reversal visual evoked response (VER).
    • To determine the threshold of aniseikonia at which binocular compensation fails and inhibition occurs.

    Main Methods:

    • Pattern reversal visual evoked response (VER) was recorded in subjects with artificially induced aniseikonia using size lenses.
    • Monocular and binocular VERs were compared across varying degrees of aniseikonia (0% to 10%).

    Main Results:

    • Binocular summation decreased significantly at 3.0% aniseikonia and was absent at 5.0%.
    • Binocular inhibition replaced summation at higher aniseikonia levels (8.0-10.0%).
    • Phase differences between binocular and monocular VERs diminished as aniseikonia increased beyond 5.0%.

    Conclusions:

    • The binocular visual system can compensate for aniseikonia up to approximately 3.0%.
    • Higher levels of aniseikonia lead to a breakdown in binocular summation and the onset of binocular inhibition.
    • Pattern reversal VER offers an objective method for assessing aniseikonia, potentially valuable in pediatric ophthalmology.

    Related Experiment Videos