Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in

Nils Thorm Milman1,2, Thomas Bergholt1,2

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Journal of Pregnancy
|November 25, 2024
PubMed

Background: Many pregnant women are reluctant to follow the recommendation concerning oral iron prophylaxis due to concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Objective: To assess the frequency of GI complaints during low-dose oral iron prophylaxis and compare three iron formulas in equipotent doses: ferrous fumarate versus ferrous bisglycinate versus ferrous sulphate, in healthy women with an uncomplicated single pregnancy. Methods: Results from two randomized, double-blind studies are reported: the Gentofte study comprising 404 women allocated into four groups taking 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate/day and the Naestved study comprising 78 women allocated into two groups: 25 mg of elemental iron as ferrous bisglycinate/day and 50 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate/day between meals from 15 to 19 weeks of gestation to delivery. GI complaints (nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain/pyrosis, belching, meteorism, borborygmi, intestinal colic, flatulence, loose stools, constipation, and use of laxatives), as well as black stools, were recorded by interview at the time of inclusion and at regular intervals during gestation. Results: At inclusion, the frequency of total combined GI complaints in all women (n = 482) was 21%. The Gentofte study showed that in the groups taking 20-60 mg iron/day as fumarate, there was no association between the iron dose and the frequency of GI side effects. An iron dose of 80 mg as fumarate was associated with significantly higher frequencies of constipation and the use of laxatives. Comparing the three equipotent doses of iron formulas, which can prevent iron deficiency, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had the most favourable GI side effect profile, while ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron had higher but similar GI side effect profiles. The frequency of black stools increased with the iron dose. Ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had a lower frequency of black stools (8%) than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron (22%) and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron (31%). Conclusion: Low-dose iron supplementation appears to have no clinically significant GI side effects, as none of the included women presented with GI complaints of such severity that it necessitated either reduction of iron dose, change to an alternative iron formula, or discontinuation of iron supplement. However, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron/day is associated with significantly fewer GI complaints than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron/day and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron/day. Ferrous bisglycinate may be preferred for iron prophylaxis, especially in women experiencing GI side effects when taking other conventional iron formulas.

Related Concept Videos

Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS01:21

Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS

Pharmacological therapies for IBS-C are designed to alleviate abdominal discomfort and enhance bowel function. In patients with IBS-C, fiber supplements may help soften stools and decrease straining, but may also lead to increased gas production and bloating. Osmotic laxatives like milk of magnesia are frequently used to soften stools and increase stool frequency in IBS-C patients. In addition, two drugs approved for use in severe IBS-C adult cases are linaclotide (Linzess) and lubiprostone...
134
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Disease States and Pharmacology01:25

Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Disease States and Pharmacology

Multiple disease states can significantly influence the oral drug absorption process by affecting blood flow and the functionality of the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Various GI diseases, including conditions that alter GI motility, such as diarrhea, decreased acid secretions (achlorhydria), and infections, have been associated with reduced drug absorption.
Substances such as alcohol and specific drugs, including antineoplastics, can also negatively impact drug absorption. For instance,...
435
Drug Absorption: Factors Affecting GI Absorption01:19

Drug Absorption: Factors Affecting GI Absorption

The process of oral drug absorption can be influenced by several factors. Weakly acidic drugs tend to be absorbed more readily from the stomach due to their nonionized state. However, absorption may be less efficient in the upper intestine, where drugs are often ionized. Interestingly, despite the stomach's apparent advantage for drug absorption, its mucous layer can hinder diffusion. Its surface area is also smaller than the intestine's, which can further slow down the absorption rate.
3.8K
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy01:30

Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy

Various diagnostic tests are employed in the diagnostic process for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), particularly to differentiate between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
317
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview01:21

Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview

When it comes to infants and young children, they are typically administered smaller doses of medication in comparison to adults. This is primarily because their organ functions still need to fully develop, meaning their bodies are not as efficient at metabolizing or eliminating drugs. Additionally, their blood-brain barrier is more permeable than in adults. As a result, high concentrations of drugs can easily penetrate the central nervous system (CNS), potentially leading to neurological...
1.9K
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents01:20

Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents

The gastric mucosa produces prostaglandins E2 (PGE2) and prostacyclin (PGI2), crucial in maintaining gastric health. They exert cytoprotective effects, including increasing bicarbonate secretion, releasing protective mucin, reducing gastric acid output, and preventing harmful vasoconstriction. These effects are mediated through various receptors, such as EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
351