Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
A Diagnostic Comparison Study between Maximal Systolic Acceleration and Acceleration Time to Detect Peripheral
Siem A Willems1, Obrecht O van Bennekom1, Abbey Schepers1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is more accurate than acceleration time (AT) for detecting peripheral arterial disease (PAD), especially in patients with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease. ACCmax should be favored for diagnosing PAD.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Ultrasound Technology
Background:
- Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) detection is challenging in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to medial arterial calcification (MAC).
- Traditional bedside tests like the ankle-brachial index have reduced accuracy in these specific patient groups.
- Point-of-care duplex ultrasound offers a potential alternative for PAD assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care duplex ultrasound parameters: maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) and acceleration time (AT).
- To compare the diagnostic performance of ACCmax and AT in detecting PAD.
- To assess accuracy in patients with or without medial arterial calcification (MAC).
Main Methods:
- Included patients suspected of PAD undergoing point-of-care duplex ultrasound (ACCmax, AT) of tibial arteries and computed tomography angiography (CTA).
- PAD defined as >50% stenosis on CTA; diagnostic accuracy of AT assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios at various cut-offs.
- Compared ACCmax and AT using McNemar test, with subgroup analyses for patients prone to MAC (DM and/or CKD).
Main Results:
- ACCmax demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy over AT in detecting PAD for both posterior tibial artery (PTA) and anterior tibial artery (ATA).
- This superiority was consistent in patients prone to medial arterial calcification (MAC).
- No significant difference was observed between ACCmax and AT in their ability to exclude PAD.
Conclusions:
- Maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is a more accurate parameter than acceleration time (AT) for diagnosing PAD, including in patients with DM or CKD.
- ACCmax should be the preferred parameter in the diagnostic work-up for suspected PAD due to its enhanced ability to detect arterial stenosis.
- Both parameters showed similar accuracy in ruling out PAD.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

