Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Navigating the challenges of initiating pediatric device trials - a case study
R Brandon Hunter1,2,3, Richard C Willson1,4, Balakrishna Haridas1,5
1Southwest National Pediatric Device Innovation Consortium (SWPDC), Houston, TX, USA.
Executing pediatric device clinical trials is complex. Streamlining clinical trial agreements, budgets, and Institutional Review Board (IRB) processes is crucial for timely pediatric device development.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Clinical Trials
- Pediatric Medical Devices
Background:
- Pediatric medical devices face significant development hurdles compared to adult devices.
- Challenges include economic factors, smaller patient pools, anatomical variations, and regulatory complexities.
- Executing pediatric clinical trials is particularly difficult, impacting innovation in this sector.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the requirements, challenges, timeline, and costs associated with multi-site pivotal clinical trials for pediatric medical devices.
- To analyze the factors influencing clinical trial execution for a Class II pediatric physiologic monitoring device.
- To identify best practices for expediting pediatric device trials while ensuring safety, ethics, and efficacy.
Main Methods:
- A case study approach focusing on a Class II pediatric physiologic monitoring device trial.
- Analysis of clinical trial agreement (CTA) and budget negotiation timelines.
- Evaluation of Institutional Review Board (IRB) processing times, including reliance models.
- Assessment of overall trial duration from site contact to first patient enrollment.
Main Results:
- The average time from site contact to first patient enrollment was 14 months.
- CTA and budget negotiations were the longest phases, averaging 10 and 9 months, respectively.
- IRB processing, including reliance, added an average of 6.5 months; regulatory oversight constituted nearly half of the costs.
- The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted enrollment timelines, though identified issues remain relevant post-pandemic.
Conclusions:
- Efficient and standardized processing of CTAs, budgets, and reliance IRB use are vital for expediting pediatric device clinical trials.
- Establishing a national clinical trials network could further streamline the pediatric device trial process.
- Addressing these logistical and administrative bottlenecks is essential for advancing pediatric medical device innovation.
More Related Videos
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
10:42Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics
Published on: June 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution