Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Assessing the Use of BotulinumtoxinA for Hyperactive Urinary Tract Dysfunction a Decade After Approval: General
Heinrich Schulte-Baukloh1,2,3, Apostolos Apostolidis4, Catarina Weiss5
1Department of Urology, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Patients undergoing onabotulinumtoxinA detrusor injections (OnabotA DI) experience significant anxiety and pain with local anesthesia (LA) during their first procedure compared to general anesthesia (GA). However, subsequent injections under LA show reduced anxiety, with most patients preferring LA despite initial discomfort.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Anesthesiology
- Patient Experience
Background:
- OnabotulinumtoxinA detrusor injection (OnabotA DI) is an established treatment for idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (nDO).
- The procedure is commonly performed under local anesthesia (LA), with ongoing efforts to minimize patient discomfort.
- Patient-reported anxiety and pain levels associated with LA versus general anesthesia (GA) for OnabotA DI have not been extensively compared.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare anxiety and pain levels in patients undergoing OnabotA DI with either local anesthesia (LA) or general anesthesia (GA).
- To assess the impact of anesthesia choice on patient experience and treatment satisfaction.
- To evaluate differences in anxiety and pain between first-time and repeat OnabotA DI procedures.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study evaluating 104 patients scheduled for OnabotA DI, offering a choice between LA and GA.
- Anxiety was assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS).
- Pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during and after the procedure; treatment success was evaluated with validated questionnaires.
Main Results:
- The General Anesthesia (GA) group reported significantly lower intraprocedural pain (VAS: 1.5 ± 1.5) compared to the Local Anesthesia (LA) group (VAS: 3.3 ± 2.2).
- Patients receiving their first OnabotA DI under LA reported higher preoperative anxiety compared to those undergoing GA.
- Anxiety scores decreased significantly for repeat injections under LA (p = 0.038), and there were no differences in treatment success between LA and GA groups.
- Despite higher initial anxiety and pain, patients receiving OnabotA DI under LA expressed a preference for LA over GA.
Conclusions:
- While the first OnabotA DI under LA may involve significant anxiety and pain compared to GA, subsequent procedures show reduced patient burden.
- Local anesthesia (LA) is favored by patients over general anesthesia (GA) for OnabotA DI, even with initial discomfort.
- The choice of anesthesia for OnabotA DI should consider patient preference and the potential for reduced anxiety in repeat procedures under LA.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...

