One-class classification with confound control for cognitive screening in older adults using gait, fingertapping,
Vânia Guimarães1, Inês Sousa2, Raquel Cunha3
1Fraunhofer Portugal AICOS, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal; Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
|November 26, 2024
Summary
Machine learning, specifically one-class classification, combined with motor-cognitive tasks shows promise for early cognitive impairment detection. This approach may offer a viable alternative to standard screening tests for identifying mild cognitive impairment.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Machine Learning
- Gerontology
Background:
- Early detection of cognitive impairment is critical for dementia intervention.
- Current screening tools are not optimal for widespread population use.
- Developing accessible screening methods is a public health priority.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the efficacy of one-class classification with motor-cognitive tasks for early cognitive impairment detection.
- To compare the performance of one-class classification against two-class classification and standard screening tests.
- To investigate the optimal method for combining data from various tasks.
Main Methods:
- Data collected on gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks from older adults (mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls).
- One-class classification modeled healthy control behavior; deviations flagged as abnormal.
- Confound regression integrated; individual tasks, early/late fusion evaluated.
Main Results:
- One-class classification demonstrated higher predictive accuracy for mild cognitive impairment.
- Gait features were most effective for one-class classification.
- Combined models outperformed combined features; one-class majority voting achieved 87.5% sensitivity and 75.7% specificity.
Conclusions:
- One-class classification with confound control effectively detects abnormal motor-cognitive patterns for early cognitive impairment detection.
- This method shows potential as an alternative to standard cognitive screening.
- Further validation in diverse clinical settings is warranted.


